Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/25/2015 1:40:34 PM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: reaganaut1

The SCOTUS lunchroom must be a very quietly uncomfortable place to be right now...


26 posted on 06/25/2015 2:47:29 PM PDT by cld51860 (Volo pro veritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Scalia eviscerates the majority opinion;
SCALIA, J., dissenting

...Having transformed two major parts of the law, the Court today has turned its attention to a third. The Act that Congress passed makes tax credits available only on an “Exchange established by the State.” This Court, however, concludes that this limi- tation would prevent the rest of the Act from working as well as hoped. So it rewrites the law to make tax credits available everywhere. We should start calling this law SCOTUScare.

Perhaps the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act will attain the enduring status of the Social Security Act or the Taft-Hartley Act; perhaps not. But this Court’s two decisions on the Act will surely be remembered through the years. The somersaults of statutory interpretation they have performed (“penalty” means tax, “further [Medi- caid] payments to the State” means only incremental Medicaid payments to the State, “established by the State” means not established by the State) will be cited by liti- gants endlessly, to the confusion of honest jurisprudence. And the cases will publish forever the discouraging truth that the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others, and is prepared to do whatever it takes to uphold and assist its favorites.


27 posted on 06/25/2015 3:50:24 PM PDT by Diamond (He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

It is quite shocking that the Chief Justice, roberts, doesn’t understand how the court is supposed to Constitutionally operate. What a toady loser. May Justice find him.


28 posted on 06/25/2015 3:55:21 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

My take is Justice Roberts was initially blackmailed over his + wife’s illegal adoption of two Irish children. Ireland does not allow foreigners to come in and adopt Irish children and spirit them way back to America. So the Roberts family had the two children sent to a Latin American nation. The Roberts adopted via that Latin American nation

But now I think he has internalized being an Obama stooge and doesn’t need to be blackmailed anymore.

__
__

More details here>>
It is now quite evident that the two Children were from Ireland. Even wikipedia references these adoptions at the time of Roberts’ confirmation, and indicates that the children were of Irish birth.

However Irish law 1) prohibits the adoption of Children to non-residents, and 2) also does not permit private adoptions, but rather has all adoptions go through a public agency.

Evidently Roberts arranged for this adoption through some sort of trafficking agency, that got the children out of Ireland and into that Latin American country, from which they were adopted, thereby circumventing two Irish laws — entirely illegal, but perhaps quasi-legitimized by the birth mothers (two) transporting the children out of Ireland.

Undoubtedly Roberts and his wife spent a great deal of money for this illegal process, circumventing Irish laws and arranging for the transit of two Irish children from separate birth-mothers to a foreign nation. Come 2012, those two children have been with the Roberts’ for roughly 10 years, since they were adopted as “infants”. - See more at: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/tea-party-nation-wonders-if-john-roberts-was-blackmailed-uphold-health-care-reform#sthash.bpZxi85E.dpuf


29 posted on 06/25/2015 4:13:04 PM PDT by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Gymnastics implies the skilful manipulation of physics (law.)
What SCOTUS did was like the “Matrix” fighting, completely ignoring physics (law) and making it up as you go.
Lawlessness.
Justice Roberts, you are no Neo.


30 posted on 06/25/2015 4:54:17 PM PDT by anymouse (God didn't write this sitcom we call life, he's just the critic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

If congressional intent is the standard, then I should be allowed to have nuclear weapons, cannons, rocket launchers, and anything else I want to defend myself, as per the intent of the 2d amendment.


31 posted on 06/25/2015 6:37:55 PM PDT by generally (Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson