Posted on 06/22/2015 10:43:04 AM PDT by xzins
Arrogance. Liberal arrogance. They just know that they are smarter than everyone else.
This is not the one I originally read, but it is of the same event:
http://socialnewsdaily.com/51708/ruth-bader-ginsberg-invokes-constitution-at-lgbt-wedding/
The Supreme Court does not represent Americans anymore.
Ever since 2012 or so, they CHANGED THE RULES so that you HAVE TO BE A MEMBER OF THE BAR to submit an Amicus Curae.
So you have LOST your right to petition the government, and are no longer bound by their rulings (which affect corporate “persons” only!).
This is probably the one I saw:
Being a chief justice means something like this:
I never lie, I always tell the truth. If you don’t believe that, you can just ask me.
The Supreme Court certainly doesn’t represent me. Everyone of these justices will one day be judged and the stakes will be much higher.
And it was at that point where the finality of determination was realized. The fix is in. There’s no going back.
We’re doomed as a culture and a nation.
Why this is not bias toward a pending case is beyond me.
If she had been out selling government raisins, you think they’d have liked her on the government raisin taking case?
I remember that too.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ginsburg-to-officiate-same-sex-wedding/2013/08/30/4bc09d86-0ff4-11e3-8cdd-bcdc09410972_story.html
We sit with anticipation, hands held out, waiting for 5 reprobates proclaim or withhold their blessing on our expressed will. How many people voted to define marriage? How many people have tried to redefine it? We don’t have to put up with this.
The other justices should have at least forced the two to address the filing against them asking for their recusal.
“Why this is not bias toward a pending case is beyond me.”
Of course it us.
Unfortunately, the only judge of justices is impeachment via the House and Senate.
The sad thing is that in the mind of Ginsburg, she thinks her stance is “normal” and that makes her unbiased.
No way would the founding fathers would have ever imagined a corrupt court like we do now. They should recuse themselves due to their actions before the very case which stands before them.
Perform.
Impeachment.....(crickets).....
Thanks, Jewbacca. I know your comment wasn’t intended to make me laugh, but it did. I imagined Boehner, a glass of cheap scotch, and a tough decision.
Silence from the other justices is the same as consent.
relevant repost.....
a compromise would be for the court to rule that marriage is between a man and a woman but that states could allow formal cohabitation contracts among two individuals that put the matter of property ownership, joint taxes, child adoption and a host of other. such an arrangement would be similar to a partnership agreement or LLC corporation
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.