Right on, dude. The fewer people with guns for self defense, the fewer deaths there will be in a mass shooting.
(Do these people even know how to breath on their own without coaching?)
Yes, because armed black parishoners are going to immediately turn away from the threat and start shooting at other parishoners and not the stranger who just showed up an hour ago who has started shooting at them. That’s how libtard logic works.
So the assumption here is that if there were some concealed handguns present when the murderer started killing the room would have erupted in chaotic gunfire? What absolute stupidity! FWIW, I’d rather find myself in the middle of a gunfight than downrange in a shooting gallery.
Of course, he is “broken clock” right. The horror of having to defend your life and others with a firearm IS unimaginable. Unfortunately, it is preferable to being an unarmed victim which, to my mind, is even more horrific.
MSNBC is now the nonstop gun control and ban the Confederate Flag network....neither of which would have done anything to stop this.
But liberal “solutions” never solve problems....they just lead to more “solutions” which involve a larger and larger central government.
What should we do to stop these kinds of massacres?
Lock up the crazies in institutions. Bring back the sanatoriums.
I bet this azzhole has armed security. When it’s his important life, it doesn’t matter if someone else gets killed.
I can see his point.
If more people who where there had guns everyone would have started shooting their assault machine gun pistols (loaded with clips of armor piercing military bullets) at once and wiped out everyone in the building and in a mile radius. /s