Not as much money as the Bucks make off of the deal.
Because the Bucks invested more than the state.
Are you a socialist? Do you think all property belongs to the state?
Wisconsin is on the hook for the current stadium. By investing some money, they will get a positive return and be relieved of the liability the existing stadium places on taxpayers.
It is a win-win all around
Not as much money as the Bucks make off of the deal.
What's your point? Since the Bucks make more than the state, should they be forced to share?
mook