Posted on 06/20/2015 10:36:03 PM PDT by Lazamataz
Pope Francis was not content with merely spreading the politics of Marxist wealth redistribution in his “climate change” fairyhoax encyclical, arguably the whole reason for its creation in the first place. He also chose to reinforce its supposed legitimacy by featuring a passage from an Islamic poet, Ali al-Khawas.
As reported in Breitbart News, the “climate” encyclical included a depiction of the Muslim poet as cautioning people not to “put too much distance between the creatures of the world and the interior experience of God.” The symbolism of incorporating this Islamic text into the encyclical is much more significant than the actual words.
What he did is as close to including Islamic teachings in a Catholic document as he could without actually quoting the Koran, an act which should have Catholics around the world scratching their heads, asking themselves “who is this guy and what is he up to?” Certainly that is what many non-Catholics are doing. There was no need for him to do what he did, either with the encyclical itself or with the Islamic inclusion and none of it is happening accidentally.
Francis quoted al-Khawas directly, writing, “The initiate will capture what is being said when the wind blows, the trees sway, water flows, flies buzz, doors creak, birds sing, or in the sound of strings or flutes, the sighs of the sick, the groans of the afflicted.”
Pope Francis has a pen and a phone of his own, it appears, which are now becoming just as infamous as those of his partner in crime, Hussein Obama. ....They share the same low opinion or hatred of America and the same goal of our downfall and ultimate elimination. Their tactics are virtually identical.
(Excerpt) Read more at rickwells.us ...
It all adds up.
Correct
Is he related to Dear Leader?
I have never been so happy to be not Catholic...
*ping of interest*
First, Pope Francis obviously didn’t write any of the document, and I doubt if he did anything but scan through and barely glance at the document.
Second, if I were one of the guys assigned to this task and I resented the whole gimmick but I was ordered to complete the document....fine, I’d write it and somewhere in the middle of it....I’d plant an Islamic reference. I’d make it blunt and noticeable, but I’d know my bosses were too stupid to ID the quote or realize the implications.
Third, my humble guess is that several foundations have used their ‘gift’ resources and given interior players at the Vatican five-star vacations, golden bracelets, and things of value to buy them off and influence them down to the Pope. Go back over 15 centuries and look at the influence upon the staff around the Pope and how hundreds of people were bought off to ensure the Pope said this or did that.
Fourth, as much as they bought into the climate hoax...they (the entire church) can’t clean up their act and be good stewards of the Earth. When the Pope climbs on some jet....how much carbon is he contributing? How much repentance does he need to show? When his cardinals or bishops get into their Mercedes, how much repentance do they need to show? When these guys get business class tickets, how much repentance do they need to show?
I’ll end this ‘rant’ with this observation. These are the same characters who had no problem in issuing Letters of Indulgence if you paid them off. How you were ever going to carry this letter with you when you died...was a joke. In terms of cleverness, they know precisely how to screw people over and make it all seem innocent and approved by God.
Well, whats the response from the IS? Have they offered their version of an Encyclical with passages from the Bible??
So are there teleprompters in the Vatican?
In the beginning, I really liked the guy and thought a lot of the things he said were due to misquotes.
I no longer think that.
Letters of Indulgence. Maybe that’s where the notion of Carbon Credits began. The advertising ,marketing and exchange of completely intangible things.
Enslaving people requires submission of people to nature instead of nature to people, turning people to cattle for sodomitic ends. Is the Pope against hunting and secretly for abortion too then? This guy is a nutbar glorified chaplain of socialist world army.
I met a lawyer once who went to the Baptist Law School in Okla. (name escapes me). He was Catholic. I remarked how odd that was. He said the priest who lead him to Our Lord told him the church desperately needs true missionaries. In that vein, I respect your Mission. God Bless.
I always cringed at such organized religion. I feel bad for good catholic people. Obviously socialism rations people so that the cheats in power can waste for a “reasonable” price golf course vacations.
The reason for capitalism is equitable price redistribution at all levels. Whenever the price is increased for some artificially, others waste it at its rock bottom propice on the other side. Socialism is price manipulation.
Read Jonah Goldbergs article from earlier today. Award Winner.
“Did you read the whole encyclical/He was mistranslated/It’s all Left-wing media distortion/He’s supergeniusclever like John Roberts because...” crowd showing up in 3... 2... 1...
The guy who came up originally (whoever he is) with carbon credits and accumulating/selling them....is a Catholic. When you look at the broad scheme of Letters of Indulgences, how they were created, their original purpose, and how they manipulated an innocent public....it was absolutely brilliant. The carbon credits scheme is the program...just modernized. I’m surprised no one has compared the two in a public setting.
I wouldn’t follow those false prophecies. I watched Jack van Impe go on and on and on about the 112th and when that didn’t work out, he went on about the 113th.
Much like 88 reasons for the rapture in 1988 and then 89 reasons for the rapture in 1989.
They’re pushing OWR. That will be the eventual outcome.
Trust the Word of God. Read Revelation chapter 13.
lol
The best thought in it was about how the American Liberls (Socialists and Marxists every where but the US) believe that what is good for everybody should be the gummints job to provide. We understand that “ one man’s food is another man’s poison” and that gummint cannot provide the same outcomes for all and even if it could that would not be Liberty. In fact, any attempt to provide “fair” outcomes (which could never happen) would require the complete surrender of any concept of Freedom. Long article but worth th effort.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.