Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can Congress override a veto on repeal of medical-device tax?
Hotair ^ | 06/19/2015 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 06/19/2015 11:24:31 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Sacajaweau

Correct. They would need another vote to specifically over-ride a veto. But that is a lot more likely to happen when the original vote was 280-140 than if it had been 220-200.


21 posted on 06/19/2015 1:17:13 PM PDT by WayneS (Trying to save myself from those who want to save me from myself...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: WayneS
Were the 15 that didn't vote dems or repubs?

This is just the usual politics playing with the hometown folks.

It's not over....well you know....

22 posted on 06/19/2015 1:21:52 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Congress and Obama....Repeal the damn tax. It should have never been in there to start with.


23 posted on 06/19/2015 1:24:46 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn

290


24 posted on 06/19/2015 1:25:43 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Article I, Section 7 of the US Constitution says "two thirds of that House" to override a presidential veto. The section doesn't separate House and Senate by those names, it calls each body a "House" and both have to pass a vetoed bill by that margin.

By way of comparison, the president's Article II, Section 2 treaty making power is expressed "provided two thirds of the Senators present concur".

The plain language is that for veto override, the number is two thirds of members "seated" (elected, not dead, etc. - sometimes less than the full 435 provided), not two thirds of those present.

25 posted on 06/19/2015 1:42:42 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

I beg to differ. I, and others in my situation, have been decrying this section of the law since it’s inception. We’ve said since the out-set that an increase in taxes on medical devices would stifle innovation and lead to increased costs passed on to consumers of high-end medical devices.

More specifically, those consumers are families of patients in ICU or NICU wards.

We’ve been largely ignored or marginalized during this debate, but we’re still fighting and we still want the whole bill repealed. If it has to be one section at a time, so be it—and let it be this provision first, because it is killing our families.


26 posted on 06/19/2015 2:16:12 PM PDT by brothers4thID (Be professional, be courteous, and have a plan to kill everyone in the room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

The key here over the next six to nine months is to start calling it Democratcare. Obama’s gone, but Dems are forever. Secondly, keep sending it to Obama’s desk and let him veto it again and again. Put vulnerable Dems on the chopping block over this. Target seniors and those who use medical devices and make certain they know that their Democrat Senator or rep went along with this tax.

It’s Democratcare all the way and they need to be pinned to it, just like a donkey.


27 posted on 06/19/2015 3:51:06 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson