Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/19/2015 5:53:55 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

They can fire someone who comes in all hungover can’t they?


2 posted on 06/19/2015 5:56:03 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

You don’t have the “right” to work at any specific company.... the rights in this equation belong to the owner of a company. If someone wants the right to do whatever he/she pleases - then he/she needs to become the owner....become their own boss.

This is a refreshing shift in the right direction for employers....


4 posted on 06/19/2015 5:59:17 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

“Coats sued after he was fired on June 7, 2010, alleging wrongful termination. He argued that marijuana was made “lawful” for the purposes of employment law when Colorado voters legalized it for medicinal use in 2000.”

So, using that logic an airline pilot could smoke pot and still fly as long as he has an RX for it?...............I think I’d rather walk than fly with that guy.


7 posted on 06/19/2015 6:05:10 AM PDT by V_TWIN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

This is between employer and employee. A business owner has every right to set rules and fire those that violate them. There is no right to a job. The courts got it right.


12 posted on 06/19/2015 6:13:28 AM PDT by SpeakerToAnimals (I hope to earn a name in battle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Well...it’s legal to drink liquor in Virginia, but if I show up to work with whiskey on my breath I’m probably going to get fired too.


15 posted on 06/19/2015 6:14:00 AM PDT by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Why would anyone want to work for a place like that anyway? Vote with your feet - quit!


23 posted on 06/19/2015 6:34:47 AM PDT by FrdmLvr ("WE ARE ALL OSAMA, 0BAMA!" al-Qaeda terrorists who breached the American compound in Benghazi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Ruling is correct. Employer has every right to require sober/straight employees. The psychoactive effects of pot last days, don't let anybody tell you otherwise.

And don't ask me how I know. I still remember some things, even at this advanced age. :-)

26 posted on 06/19/2015 6:45:23 AM PDT by dayglored (Meditate for twenty minutes every day, unless you are too busy, in which case meditate for an hour.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The entire legal system is in place to govern cause and effect, while also making use of cause and effect. When it comes to substances which cause erratic, dysfunctional, or maliferous behavior to the extent/effect life and property of others is, or is more likely to be effected negatively, then the law places strictures on those substances and penalties upon those who choose to imbibe depsite the prohibition.

The threat of penalty serves as a restraint, and the penalty serves the interest of justice. The question I think law needs to address is whether citizens should be retrained and punished merely on the basis of potential behavior, or on the basis of actual behavior. Because today’s laws are, IMO, draconian in their prohibitions and penalties when it comes to use of self-medications, stimulants, and the like, I am inclined to see the law applied to actual behavioral results as opposed to mere potential.

Meanwhile, I look for the day when I have travel privately with an ice cold brew in hand without fear of some mad prospect hounding me into loss of liberty. With the dawn of self-driving vehicles that day may be at hand.


35 posted on 06/19/2015 7:31:28 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (Even the compassion of the wicked is cruel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
They need to get a doctors recommendation . . .
they know best..
36 posted on 06/19/2015 7:55:18 AM PDT by ßuddaßudd (>> F U B O << "What the hell kind of country is this if I can only hate a man if he's white?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s legal to smoke pot in Colorado
Wonder what the accident rate is at work places after they made pot legal in the stoner state?.


37 posted on 06/19/2015 8:12:44 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
“Nothing in the language of the [employment] statute limits the term ‘lawful’ to state law,” wrote Justice Allison H. Eid. “Instead, the term is used in its general, unrestricted sense,

Despite the fact that the employment statute in question is a state law. Quislings.

41 posted on 06/19/2015 9:24:04 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson