Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pro-trade Democrats huddle over fast-track strategy
Politico ^ | 06/17/2015 | JAKE SHERMAN, MANU RAJU and LAUREN FRENCH

Posted on 06/17/2015 10:47:41 AM PDT by GIdget2004

House Speaker John Boehner’s plan, as laid out to several aides and lawmakers, would attempt to pass Trade Promotion Authority as a standalone bill. The Senate, meanwhile, would amend a trade “preferences” bill with Trade Adjustment Assistance, the job-training and program that was defeated on the House floor last week.

But Democrats want several assurances before moving forward.

For one, pro-trade House Democrats want to be sure that if they back a fast-track bill without the worker aid measure, like-minded Senate Democrats will also vote for it. Senate Democrats want a promise that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Boehner will agree to amend the preferences bill with an extension of the expiring TAA program, a key Democratic priority.

Senate Finance Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), who coauthored the Senate bill, said in an interview that Republicans would move to include the worker aid program in the trade preferences plan. That’s the cost to of winning critical Democratic support for fast-track, which would prohibit Congress from making changes to the Trans-Pacific Partnership, Hatch said.

“I don’t think there’s any question we’d do that,” he said. “That’s part of the deal. We know the quid pro quo for TPA is TAA.”

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: tisa; tpa; tpp; wikileaks

1 posted on 06/17/2015 10:47:41 AM PDT by GIdget2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

NO tp TPA in any form!


2 posted on 06/17/2015 10:49:27 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

It would be nice if some reporter would ask why TAA is necessary if TPP will create jobs, as it’s supporters say.


3 posted on 06/17/2015 10:55:52 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Huddle? Huddle? They got nothing to worry about. GOP-e to the rescue of the Dims once again.

Oldplayer


4 posted on 06/17/2015 11:01:04 AM PDT by oldplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

What’s so bleeping important that they need to do this crap anyhow? If trade negotiations are that important, why can’t bozo do it without all this fuss? If it fails he wil blame congress either way. So let him do it on his own.


5 posted on 06/17/2015 11:03:11 AM PDT by Bobby_Taxpayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Not this president. I don’t want him to give him _more_ power.

Especially since a similar amount of power would be surrendered by the legislative branch simultaneously.

Not this president. No.


6 posted on 06/17/2015 11:14:26 AM PDT by Principled (Government Slowdown using the budget process!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

If this thing is so great, then why is “displaced worker aid” necessary?


7 posted on 06/17/2015 11:15:01 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
"worker aid program"

This smells to high heaven. So this secret back room deal bill is going to allow H1-b workers and others to swarm into the country, PUT AMERICANS OUT OF WORK, and then we are gonna ask American tax payers to pay for welfare checks on all of this. Just great.

8 posted on 06/17/2015 11:18:39 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator

Was moveon.org standing on the right side of this issue against TAA, for some reason.


9 posted on 06/17/2015 11:27:14 AM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

How many more times can they cram down legislation that clear majorities of Americans strongly oppose, without setting off some type of revolution?


10 posted on 06/17/2015 11:32:28 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

Well, they are against it for other reasons.


11 posted on 06/17/2015 11:35:17 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson