“The speech was fine. “
Not if one actually tried to listen to her give it.
It was choppy, repetitive, disconnected, robotic (according to some commentaries).
Hillary is trying a new style* — speaking softly and slowly. It, however, comes across as condescending:
‘you are too
stupid to
understand me, so
I will
speak softly
and slowly
to you —
commoners.’
—
* new style - some are actually saying this could be a result of a concussion injury she apparently had in the latter part of her SoS stint.
==
Of course, her sycophants in the media thought it was the greatest speech since Obama’s last greatest speech in the history of speeches.
It, however, was filled with nothing new. It was the same ole litany of liberalism. Light on specifics and heavy on Santa-ism or RobinHood-ism.
Compare her style of speaking, plus the content, with that of Carley Fiorina. Different as night and day. Say what you will about Carley Fiorina, she is articulate, witty, sharp, and speaks with clarity and conviction. I would like to hear a lot more of what Ms. Fiorina has to say vs. that phony, lying, fake lunatic of a female called Hildabeast! (What an insult to Queen Elizabeth...referring to Hildabeast’s stage performance as “The Queen’s Speech.” Insult indeed!)