[Falconspeed]

Thanks for posting this essay. Part Five like the previous chapters is a mess and tries to cover many, many points. The bottom line is that the author is young and confused about the clarity of Catholic doctrine and the confusion of deviant pathology. He will get clarity with further study and prayer.

I agree with the author that we need to “convince them that there is no safe way to surrender.” Yes, that is the goal of warfare: to convince the enemy that they are psychologically defeated before dropping a bomb.

The good news for Catholic and Western culture is that deviants are already psychologically defeated. People who lack a clean conscience and who feel compelled to continue sinning are weak, powerless and handicapped. They are stubborn and simply cannot admit the obvious: they are defeated.

The greatest punishment for deviants (pro abortionists, pro sodomites, pro communists) is to remain deviants at their death. Then their punishment will be severe and their regret will become dreadful and real.

[DeweyCA]

I understood the author to be saying that the gay faction has failed to offer us a safe way to surrender. The gay activists want total victory. They are not willing to compromise and so we cannot feel safe to surrender to them. I believe that is what the author is saying. And he is right when he says that it is very hard for conservatives to trust gays when they have consistently lied and misrepresented their intentions for many years. Gays and Dem leaders do not believe in "freedom of religion". They are only willing to concede "freedom of worship", ie. like churches in the USSR were allowed to operate within their own building, but not anywhere outside of it. Actually, gays won't even want to allow that, since they will want to force churches to perform gay weddings and not be able to teach against homosexuality.