Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. EPA takes first step to regulate aircraft greenhouse gas emissions
Reuters Via CBC ^ | 06/10/2015

Posted on 06/10/2015 6:45:31 AM PDT by Phlap

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday said greenhouse gases from aircraft endanger human health, taking the first step toward regulating emissions from the domestic aviation industry.

The EPA's endangerment finding kicks off a process to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from the aviation industry, the latest sector to be regulated under the Clean Air Act after cars, trucks and large stationary sources like power plants.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbc.ca ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: carbondioxide; epa; globalwarming
Given this, when will Air Force One be replaced by an ocean liner for overseas and a train for domestic travel?
1 posted on 06/10/2015 6:45:31 AM PDT by Phlap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Phlap

I’ll presume, for tin foil sake, this does not apply to contrails.


2 posted on 06/10/2015 6:46:20 AM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phlap

Is the EPA out to kill all industries or is it just making rules to expand its influence? If Congress doesn’t start doing its sworn duty, the EPA will have us using nothing but stone tools pretty soon.


3 posted on 06/10/2015 6:49:35 AM PDT by econjack (I'm not bossy...I just know what you should be doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C210N
I’ll presume, for tin foil sake, this does not apply to contrails chemtrails.

There, I fixed it.

4 posted on 06/10/2015 6:51:44 AM PDT by Quality_Not_Quantity (Liars use facts when the truth doesn't suit their purposes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: econjack

The EPA is becoming the 4th branch of gov’t.


5 posted on 06/10/2015 6:52:30 AM PDT by umgud (When under attack, victims want 2 things; God & a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Phlap

When last I checked, our spy planes used a fuel additive - chlorofluorosufonic acid - to suppress the tell-tale contrails.

This injects chlorine and fluorine, both known ozone destroyers, directly into the upper atmosphere.

OTHO, we peons are not allowed to use freons to keep chlorine and fluorine from damaging the ozone layer...


6 posted on 06/10/2015 6:52:52 AM PDT by null and void (I wish we lived in less interesting times, but at least we have front-row seats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phlap
Given this, when will Air Force One be replaced by an ocean liner for overseas and a train for domestic travel?

It’s high time they replace Air Force 1 with a Tier 4-compliant sea kayak.

7 posted on 06/10/2015 7:00:03 AM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

The aircraft has a bay outboard of each of the main landing gear that was originally supposed to store contrail-suppression chemicals but was never used. The two bays are about 2.75 meters (9 feet) long and are as deep as the wing. The original B-2 design included tanks outboard of the main landing gear that would store a chemical to mix with the exhaust and suppress contrail formation. According to one report, “chlorofluorosulphonic acid” was to be injected into the jet exhaust to eliminate contrails. But this scheme wasn’t actually used. Several other acids were tested too, but the result was that the chemicals were too corrosive.

It seems that “chlorofluorosulphonic acid” is unobtainium, as the term only occurs in a few articles about stealth. Possibly what is meant is “chloro fluoro sulfone” which goes by the IUPAC name “Sulfuryl chloride fluoride” [ClF O2 S]. This compound is employed as a solvent for highly oxidizing compounds, and reacts violently with water.

Sulfonic acid has a sulfur atom bonded to a carbon atom of a hydrocarbon and bonded also to three oxygen atoms, one of which has been attached to a hydrogen atom. Sulfonic acid is acidic due to the hydrogen atom, stronger than a carboxylic acid.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/stealth-aircraft-vulnerabilities-contrails.htm


8 posted on 06/10/2015 7:19:05 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Phlap
The thing is that thanks to new engine technology, today's jet engines emit WAY less emissions than in the past, not to mention being way more fuel efficient. Boeing's upcoming 777-9X (which will likely be called 777-900 in the final version) carries the same pax/cargo load as the 747-400 but with 25% lower fuel burn and emissions than the 747 model, not to mention 1,000 nautical miles more range.
9 posted on 06/10/2015 7:20:58 AM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala

How about bringing back the Viking Longboat. Michelle would look pretty cute standing on the bow the ship wearing a Viking Helmet and brandishing a Viking staff.


10 posted on 06/10/2015 7:33:09 AM PDT by pleasenotcalifornia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

Doesn’t matter. The EPA is trying to find a big enough cork to hammer into the engine exhaust.


11 posted on 06/10/2015 7:48:44 AM PDT by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: econjack

Congress is full of grifters. They will listen to all industry complaints when they see the money.


12 posted on 06/10/2015 8:38:47 AM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Phlap

When will they start worrying about methane from swamps or CO2 from rotting wood and leaves in the forests?


13 posted on 06/10/2015 8:50:18 AM PDT by CPOSharky (I was born with nothing, and I still have most of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pleasenotcalifornia
How about bringing back the Viking Longboat. Michelle would look pretty cute standing on the bow the ship wearing a Viking Helmet and brandishing a Viking staff.

She would look pretty good on an oar next to Ben Hur on a Roman Galley. Nothing but a loincloth and a boob belt.

RAMMING SPEED!


14 posted on 06/10/2015 9:05:41 AM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pleasenotcalifornia

How about bringing back the Viking Longboat. Michelle would look pretty cute standing on the bow the ship wearing a Viking Helmet and brandishing a Viking staff.
Better Idea
vking-bote

15 posted on 06/10/2015 1:51:11 PM PDT by Foolsgold (Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala

“She would loo”k pretty good on an oar next to Ben Hur on a Roman Galley.” “Nothing but a loincloth and a boob belt.”

Not a pretty picture, what do you think?


16 posted on 06/10/2015 4:39:03 PM PDT by pleasenotcalifornia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Foolsgold

I like it.


17 posted on 06/10/2015 4:39:32 PM PDT by pleasenotcalifornia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson