Posted on 06/05/2015 3:47:08 PM PDT by ObamahatesPACoal
Pro-amnesty, pro-gay marriage, pro-Marco Rubio RINO Sean Hannity responded to criticism from pro-amnesty, psychotic neocon RINO Lindsey Graham…
I’m not a RINO like Lindsey Graham.
…
You spent the majority of your life in politics, compromising– and [America’s] problems have arisen during your watch, not my watch!
(Excerpt) Read more at mofopolitics.com ...
Has Hannity ever called a Republican in office a RINO before?
I only remember him politely saying Boehner needs to be replace.
Personally I think that the RINO appellation is inappropriate. I think they’re both textbook Republicans. I just get annoyed whenever anyone tries to float the notion that either of them are in any way conservative.
Sean has openly said he was going to give time to all of the Republican candidates. He is not taking taking sides, in my view.
Agree or disagree at the ballot box.
I think they’re both textbook Republicans.
Text book republicans are for a/the Republic..
Text book democrats are for a Democracy...
Democracy is the road to socialism. -Karl Marx
Democracy is indispensable to socialism.
The goal of socialism is communism. -V.I. Lenin
The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism .-Karl Marx
Many republicans do NOT know the difference between a republic and a democracy...
Democracy (( IS )) mob rule by mobsters..
Every time, every place, anywhere, historically, presently, and will always be in the future..
Democracy is rule by Demagogues....... ALWAYS..
RINO has come to mean not conservative. I agree it’s not accurate.
In fact most of the Republicans in office are not conservative. The Republican Party is not conserative. They may be CINO’s, but they are Republicans.
The only conservative I see in this race is Ted Cruz.
“Personally I think that the RINO appellation is inappropriate. I think they’re both textbook Republicans.”
You are correct, sir. McCainiac and Grahamnesty are true Republicans, not Republicans in name only. Sessions and Cruz are RINOs—they are members of the Republican party but they don’t really belong there because they are solid conservatives, not big government go-alongs.
how about... RRINO?
Reagan Republican In Name Only.
;)
Do you know what a group of RINOs (rhinos) is called? A “crash.” (No kidding!)
Criticisms can be made without so thoroughly trashing Reagan's 11th commandment, although that may take a bit more thought & effort, and some class, too.
Reagan Republican In Name Only.
If the doubled r's were rolled when it was said, it could take on additional sarcastic aspect.
I have not listened to Hannity in so long. I didn’t know he came out in favor of homo marriage.
Hannity always calls himself a Reagan conservative.
I cannot recall him doing so, I think the author is mistaken.
Reagan's 11th Commandment applied to Republicans.
Nor have I. Does he still invite "his good friend, 'The Architect'", on?
And Bruce Jenner calls himself a woman.
I think I may see your point, even though I need guess at what the further ramifications of it may be...
Meanwhile, I would suggest that as difficult as it may be, those who are fed up with the GOP and would like to see an effective (and mainly conservative) third party independent of present-day squish RepublicRats, take care to temper our own criticisms of those who are real & potential political allies of our own much maligned TEA political instincts.
In this it could be beneficial to us all in the long run to reserve the worst of our bile for the more openly declared political enemies of our souls, such as Marxist Democrats, and whoever is their foremost enablers --- like the alphabet network executives, the opinions and comments of media figures employed at those quasi-news outlets, NGO's of a wide variety of stripe, and last AND least --- those politicians who are registered Republican Party members (who do vote with us at least part of the time, instead of always against us, as the majority of the 'Rat Party does) but who otherwise occasionally can't seem to retrain themselves from giving form of succor to our political adversaries.
What I would seriously like to avoid, is not only what this nation went through in the last two presidential election cycles (and received as final result), but here closer to home (on this forum) that we avoid being the leading and most effective critics of those who are running against the previously identified adversaries (enemies of our political souls, as it were).
The fallout from the intense internecine bickering among ourselves, over each and every candidate other than Romney (who seeming hardly nobody but Ann Coulter actually liked as a Presidential candidate) gutted this place of how many long term members?
If I myself witnessed dozens of persons be either out-right zapped/escorted to the door, how many more were there who simply threw up their hands and walked away due to the intensity of the disagreements?
FreeRepublic is still suffering the fallout from all of that, much more than bitterness and less-than well tempered comments on the 'religion forum' portion of this site has possibly diminished our overall effectiveness, and significantly slowed the pace of donations, IMO.
Around here many of us were like the worst aspects of the Romney campaign strategists --- best and most effective at taking out the hometown competition, undercutting & kneecapping the Republican field into oblivion, by default helping make way for Romney (the last candidate on most people's list) who then went all patty-cake smiley face "can't we just all get along" with Zippy, when instead the only chance the nation had for avoiding yet another term of the crypto muslim marxist-in-chief was to go for that guy's throat, gut & knees all at once, everyday, hard, fast, and relentlessly.
That doesn't mean that all Republicans should get a entirely safe walk to first base.
Make them duck many of the same sort of hard-balls being thrown at 'Rat heads. But keeping throwing what has best chances of hitting Demo-Rats. It doesn't have to be fair & square.
Play by [ultimately---dishonest] 'Rat rules, for a change..?
But make those pitches count. Do not allow bases to be gained by pitching too many wide and wild pitches.
Beaning them (figuratively) is legal in this version of hardball...so don't hesitate to hurl high and inside brush-back pitches.
Make it hurt, if possible.
America loves a good fight, and loves a smiling winner.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.