Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/03/2015 6:27:20 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: maggief

Certainly makes more sense than Lincoln Chaffee.


2 posted on 06/03/2015 6:30:28 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

how rich would that be having a freaking multi billionaire as the nominee for those commie pigs

....and the big gulp ban commercials would be plentiful ....


3 posted on 06/03/2015 6:31:35 PM PDT by thestob (Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief
So the angry anti-1%ers want a Billionaire for their candidate?

Those voters need to be smacked out of their hypocrisy on a cold morning.

4 posted on 06/03/2015 6:33:24 PM PDT by MaxMax (Call the local GOP and ask how you can support CRUZ for POTUS, Make them talk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

OK, maybe Bloomberg as a sacrificial candidate (no chance of winning with Obama breaking the Democrat brand). My bet was on Andrew Cuomo, current governor of NY, to be the Democrat candidate for President once Hillary self-destructs and the Democrat leadership begs him to step up.

Mrs. M-D


6 posted on 06/03/2015 6:38:48 PM PDT by mason-dixon (As Mason said to Dixon, you have to draw the line somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

If he runs the US as well as he runs New York, in twenty years we’ll all be speaking either Chinese or Russian.

Or Arabic.


7 posted on 06/03/2015 6:40:57 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

He campaigned as a Republican to become mayor of NY. So the Dems are going to turn to a plutocrat, the ultimate nanny stater?


9 posted on 06/03/2015 6:47:38 PM PDT by jmacusa (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief
He's 5 feet tall and his speaking style is to lecture people as if they are idiots.

He is even less relatable than Hillary Clinton.

11 posted on 06/03/2015 6:56:41 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief
Warren has told the progressive base in no uncertain terms that ‘no’ means ‘no,’...

Does ‘no’ really REALLY mean ‘no’? The party that makes up new concepts, the party that invented "rape rape", surely if she won't "accept" the "nomination", they can invent "accepting accepting" the "nomination nomination".

12 posted on 06/03/2015 7:02:34 PM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

At this point, perhaps the democrats should trot out Al Sharpton again.


13 posted on 06/03/2015 7:04:24 PM PDT by adorno (a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

Well, Soda Pop never tasted the same after the introduction of HFCS, so what’s not to like?


15 posted on 06/03/2015 7:06:53 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

Oh man...I almost wish Bloomie would be the Dem nominee...just to see Cruz or Walker chew him and his Napoleon complex to pieces in the debates.

I am surprised Warren has chosen (at this point) not to run. I honestly think she’d be tougher to beat that Hillary in the general, and the extra-left left wing types would line up behind her a lot faster than Bernie. Glad she looks to be sitting this one out (so far).


16 posted on 06/03/2015 7:55:44 PM PDT by DemforBush (Ex-Democrat, and NotforJeb. Just so we're clear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

What they are doing is trying to set someone up for a third-party run in the general election. They are sensing that Hillary can’t get to 50% and for her to get elected, it will have to be a three-way race like with Perot.


17 posted on 06/03/2015 8:27:08 PM PDT by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

While I appreciate the optimistic attitude towards 2016, does anyone here have any idea what States that Obama carried in 2012 would actually flip for the Republican Candidate this time around?

I feel like the number of Electoral Votes needed to get the Job done is out of reach no matter what we do.

Am I alone in this concern, or is a Tsunami of Conservatism on the horizon that I just can’t envision?


18 posted on 06/03/2015 8:38:00 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Hillary, because it's time for a POTUS without a SCROTUS...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

Hmm...potentially good for Conservatives.

He could easily beat Hillary and if the GOP nominates Cruz, Walker, or Rubio, they wouldn’t have much trouble beating Bloomy.

I don’t care if you don’t like Rubio, I’m just saying Rubio could beat Bloomy.


21 posted on 06/03/2015 9:20:28 PM PDT by G Larry (Obama Hates America, Israel, Capitalism, Freedom, and Christianity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

I think its a 60% chance Bloomberg gets the nomination in 16
We already see he has a network across the country promoting his agenda.


23 posted on 06/03/2015 9:36:06 PM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

They are looking for their Bob Dole. Unfortunately, the mob beat him up and he is blind

He was however un worthy. Rather than Dirty Harry, he could merely rise to the level of Dingy Harry

No Democrat worth a damn wants to run because they know it will be impossible to win with the foul taste of Obama in Americas mouths

Then there is the money. It has all been already stolen, so why bother


26 posted on 06/04/2015 4:47:07 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... No peace? then no peace!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson