Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/03/2015 11:41:01 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Some call it skirting the boundaries of propriety..

Others see it as exacting justice..

I see a lot of fat mattresses in politicos futures here on out.

Banks are quasi gubamental organisms.. And bound by law to same.


2 posted on 06/03/2015 11:45:01 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (SEMPER FI!! - Monthly Donors Rock!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Why? Because we let them. When these laws started, we could have stood up and stopped it, but as usual, we said “Hell, they’re just doing to those other people, so I don’t care”.


3 posted on 06/03/2015 11:46:09 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Refusing to let the cops into your home without a warrant is “avoiding government scrutiny”.


5 posted on 06/03/2015 11:50:27 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

structuring financial transactions “to evade currency transaction reporting requirements” is a violation of federal law.


This is right up there with asset forfeiture as absurd government overreach.

If you own a business that deals in a lot of cash and gross under $10k a day to the tune off $8500 one day, $9800 another, etc. you may find yourself in trouble for the appearance of evading currency transaction reporting requirements.

Add to this the fact that when this was enacted you could have bought MULTIPLE new cars for under that amount of money you see the challenges inflation has brought to the issue.


9 posted on 06/03/2015 11:54:32 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

What if the government installed surveillance cameras on various streets in a municipality and then made it a crime to walk along a route that skirted those cameras?


Excellent analogy to point out the absurdity of the law.


10 posted on 06/03/2015 11:55:54 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s because you are their subject and tax slave rather than them being your public servant. Simple really.


12 posted on 06/03/2015 12:01:19 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Well, when I transfer funds in excess of 10K, it is to write a check to the effing government for taxes. Now, where does that leave me? D@mned if I do, and D@mned if I don’t.


14 posted on 06/03/2015 12:02:41 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Because we let them get away with making it so. While the unmitigated support for the Patriot Act was rampant, equally abysmal laws were passed before it.

They keep us scared and rely on a bumper sticker mentality. If we are survive, it will take a clean slate of Representatives and a repeal of many a law.


16 posted on 06/03/2015 12:14:04 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

MOST small retail businesses make daily deposits of less than $10,000.

Often it is at the SUGGESTION OF THE BANK, to avoid the paperwork.

This “structuring” “law” has become a fund raising scheme for government agencies, and it has NOTHING to do with fighting crime.

You see, there is risk in fighting criminals....and why do that?


17 posted on 06/03/2015 12:15:48 PM PDT by G Larry (Obama Hates America, Israel, Capitalism, Freedom, and Christianity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Look here the deal... a government employee with a security clearance was being blackmailed and he hid it....that is a crime...what if it was a foreign power blacking for information or a corporation looking for inside info or a vote?...

A government employee or elected official with clearance do not have a right to hide being blackmailed

If he wanted to pay the hush money.. quit the government, surrender your clearance....and become a private citizen

they he can pay all the hush money out he pleases and I'll support him in his right to do so with no one sticking their nose into it

18 posted on 06/03/2015 12:20:12 PM PDT by tophat9000 (An Eye for an Eye, a Word for a Word...nothing more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Is it a crime to drive 65 mph because you’re avoiding breaking a 70 mph limit?


22 posted on 06/03/2015 12:34:52 PM PDT by ryan71 (Bibles, Beans and Bullets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
But if you’re not actually breaking any of those laws, what are you really guilty of if you intentionally obfuscate your activities or hide yourself from the prying eyes of Uncle Sam? I’m failing to see how that is validly held to be a crime under our constitution.

“There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.” ― Ayn Rand

25 posted on 06/03/2015 12:49:24 PM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & Ifwater the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Nice article but I think the hidden news here is this is vindictive prosecution. Punishment for something.


26 posted on 06/03/2015 1:05:36 PM PDT by Usagi_yo (Abuse rolls down hill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Thing is, the fedgov clearly DOES track <$10k transactions. Otherwise, they would not know that he broke the rule!


27 posted on 06/03/2015 1:15:06 PM PDT by piytar (Good will be called evil and Evil will be called good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

We need to repeal bad laws, and “structuring” laws should join “civil asset forfeiture” laws and all federal firearms laws in being repealed as soon as possible.


30 posted on 06/03/2015 1:36:52 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Because we are no longer a truly Free People.

When we reach the point, which we have, that some in the Media and out Fellow Citizens advocate limits in Free Speech with no blowback, we are doomed.


34 posted on 06/03/2015 5:01:45 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Hillary, because it's time for a POTUS without a SCROTUS...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson