Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texas Eagle

Oddly enough, Patriot Act provisions are only rarely used against terrorists and potential terrorists. However, there are a huge number of other surveillance systems independent of the Patriot Act, such as:

NarusInsight, the replacement for CARNIVORE (later renamed DCS1000), created by a subsidiary of Boeing, which is how the FBI directly monitors email and electronic communications. CARNIVORE was implemented in October 1997.

CALEA, the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (1994), which creates back doors in communications and Internet companies, allowing federal agencies to monitor all telephone, broadband internet, and VoIP traffic in real-time.

If the FBI and others don’t want to request companies first, they use DCSNet and the related Red Hook system, which do so surreptitiously.

These were all highly efficient systems, as well as many others not mentioned, and worked quite well against terrorists and terrorism. What the Patriot act did was increase the amount of surveillance a hundred fold, but the vast majority of that surveillance is not directed at known or suspected terrorists, but at everyone else.

“We spy on everybody because we can. Screw ethics.”


13 posted on 06/03/2015 7:26:58 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Yep.

Snowden interview:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEVlyP4_11M


14 posted on 06/03/2015 7:53:39 AM PDT by null and void (I wish we lived in less interesting times, but at least we have front-row seats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson