Posted on 06/02/2015 6:49:11 AM PDT by Whenifhow
In March, the federal government removed the latest vaccine injury court statisticsmore than a years worth of datafrom one of its publicly reported charts. It was an abrupt departure from the normal practice of updating the figures monthly.
Wiping the latest data means the adjudication chart on a government website no longer reflects the recent, sharp rise in court victories for plaintiffs who claimed their children were seriously injured or killed by one or more vaccines.
Since January of 2014, twice as many victims have won court decisions than the previous eight years combined. In these court decisions, a judge ruled the evidence showed vaccines more likely than not caused the plaintiffs injuries.
Also on the rise is the number of vaccine injury cases the government has conceded: up 55% in a little over one year.
As a result of the recent website changes, neither of these trends is reflected on the current adjudication chart.
(Excerpt) Read more at sharylattkisson.com ...
Recent Rise in Vaccine Victims Court Decisions and Concessions Not Reflected in Revised Government Chart
Down the Memory Hole it goes.
The Libs appear to have really p*ssed this lady off.
She is doing some real journalism these days.
Since retiring from the military I refuse to get any vaccines. People at work were shocked when I refused the free flu shot.
Keep up the good work Sharyl!
1984 was an instruction manual for them
This is huge.
If anyone here allows their newborn children to be vaccinated, you’re crazy. Definitely wait a couple years and study all sources and I mean all sources and make a truly educated decision.
The government is hiding this info because it is basically proof that vaccines are, with each new case, proving to cause severe disabilities and deaths for some kids. These paltry few cases where the damage happened exactly after the vaccine was given and made it to a case, clearly to judges are going more and more toward the plaintiff. Only severe disabilities and deaths make it to this point. Autism probably doesn’t.
This is a big deal. Some kids, exponentially more than the number of cases demonstrates, are going to be permanently disabled even if only mild autism (which is not mild if it’s your child and they are wholly inflexible for 20+ years) or ADHD. Maybe your child or grandchild.
Read the whole article.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.