Pic at Link. So what to my United States Army "brethren" think of this?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: US Navy Vet
because we need to spend more money!
2 posted on
06/02/2015 6:10:16 AM PDT by
Mr. K
(Palin/Cruz - to defeat HilLIARy/Warren)
To: US Navy Vet
3 posted on
06/02/2015 6:11:54 AM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: US Navy Vet
$102 for a uniform is too much
5 posted on
06/02/2015 6:15:43 AM PDT by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: US Navy Vet
Basically mini-Woodland pattern.
Never should have left Woodland for that stupid blue cyber crap.
6 posted on
06/02/2015 6:16:27 AM PDT by
gaijin
To: US Navy Vet
We'll spend millions to get a new uniform that "will perform
as well as the MultiCam pattern troops wear in Afghanistan."
Millions for no improvement, except to the bottom line of the campaign donor uniform manufacturers.
Not to worry though, the sub-minimum wage front line soldiers have plenty of spare bucks to pay for the new uniforms out of their own pockets...
7 posted on
06/02/2015 6:16:39 AM PDT by
null and void
(I wish we lived in less interesting times, but at least we have front-row seats.)
To: US Navy Vet
Im thinking it will probably end up looking something like the artists conception.. in the photo below...
The new Mooselim Outreach Camo!
9 posted on
06/02/2015 6:18:55 AM PDT by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: US Navy Vet
Another Army uniform change?
Will probably include those cute, made-in-China, berets.
Maybe in PC pink this time?
10 posted on
06/02/2015 6:19:01 AM PDT by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: US Navy Vet
Not very effective. I can still see him.
11 posted on
06/02/2015 6:20:38 AM PDT by
Louis Foxwell
(This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
To: US Navy Vet
This old soldier says Phooey!
The plain old olive drab uniforms, (pre-1980), worked just fine.
12 posted on
06/02/2015 6:20:57 AM PDT by
PROCON
(CRUZing into 2016 with Ted.)
To: US Navy Vet
I read someplace that the new version is basically the Multicam with more black, vertical lines (to represent twigs).
So ..when do the troops have to start paying for their own weapons?
13 posted on
06/02/2015 6:21:37 AM PDT by
moovova
To: US Navy Vet
15 posted on
06/02/2015 6:23:15 AM PDT by
Daffynition
("We Are Not Descended From Fearful Men")
To: US Navy Vet
Why does a change exist?
We had OD. That wasnt good for SouthEast Asia, so we had jungle stripe. That wasnt good for the, then, threat
os Western Europe, so we had woodland camo. That wasnt good enough to fight saddam, so we went three
color then six color m and m dessrt camo. Then all the
mix up of camos, as per which arm of the military chose
their own slant on it.
Money, money, money spent on all those changes,
but why not make all those camo outfits
particular to the theater of operation, only?
I mean, military stationed in the swamps of
Louisiana wearing desert camo?
Or ... Is this new camo going to be used against the
American populace?
To: US Navy Vet
Urban Camouflage
21 posted on
06/02/2015 6:29:57 AM PDT by
MaxMax
(Call the local GOP and ask how you can support CRUZ for POTUS, Make them talk!)
To: US Navy Vet
Maybe I'm not informed, but why do the soldiers who will never see combat action or engagement need to have camouflage uniforms ?...
Seems as much money they spend on uniforms, using a simple green uniform for such people would be financially prudent..
Maybe one of you veterans can explain this to me..
22 posted on
06/02/2015 6:32:49 AM PDT by
Popman
(Christ Alone: My Cornerstone...)
To: US Navy Vet
I remember the first few month I was in Viet Nam. All I had were stateside fatigues and regular boots. The fatigues even had my name tag (white) and US ARMY (green and yellow) as well as my jump wings (white). Some camouflage!
As my fatigues rotted away they were replaced with jungle fatigues and at some point I got the new boots.
25 posted on
06/02/2015 6:37:33 AM PDT by
CIB-173RDABN
(I do not doubt that our climate changes. I only doubt that anything man does has any effect.)
To: US Navy Vet
Basically a happy return to the Salad Suit that I wore for half of my career. Pickle Suit for the first half.
26 posted on
06/02/2015 6:37:35 AM PDT by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: US Navy Vet
With this regime, I’m surprised that it wasn’t blaze Orange.
27 posted on
06/02/2015 6:37:47 AM PDT by
jmcenanly
("The more corrupt the state, the more laws." Tacitus, Publius Cornelius)
To: US Navy Vet
"In the close fight, soldiers rely on camouflage to provide concealment, and that is critically important to their mission effectiveness."So are Rules of Engagement that actually make sense.
31 posted on
06/02/2015 6:42:51 AM PDT by
Bloody Sam Roberts
("It is never untimely to yank the rope of freedom's bell." - - Frank Capra)
To: US Navy Vet
Pic at Link. So what to my United States Army "brethren" think of this? It doesn't work. I can clearly see the troop.
32 posted on
06/02/2015 6:44:24 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
(America has less than a year left.)
To: US Navy Vet
An administration spokes person stated that the grease paint, red nose and floppy shoes are ready now, but Lockheed’s mil spec lapel flower squirt gun was still having software problems.
33 posted on
06/02/2015 6:47:34 AM PDT by
Lee Enfield
(The tree ferrets give no warning.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson