If he supports protecting the Constitutional Republic and re-establishing the Constitution, I’m for that.
I agree. Too few talk Constitution, freedom, and liberty. I mean OUR freedom, not the elite’s.
Maybe Mr. Paul doesn’t have a real chance as some people say. But he’s standing up against the PA and his talk should cause others to do the same.
What other issues are more important than a government bent on tyranny?
“If he supports protecting the Constitutional Republic and re-establishing the Constitution, I’m for that.”
My wife and I just finished watching Paul, Wyden and Heidrich on the floor of the Senate. They all made the case for the fact that the Patriot Act sections that deal with metadata collection are 1) ineffective at stopping terrorists, 2) abridge individual liberty, and 3) have been used to facilitate domestic criminal investigations in violation of the provisions of the act itself. Just the fact that they were willing to force the conversation that the “Senate Leaders” sought to squelch was refreshing. Once again, it appears from what was said, that The Patriot Act was “handed to the Congress” by the Bush Administration, it was not reviewed, and was passed essentially as a “black check.” I really do hate Bitch and his dickless buddy over in the Speaker’s seat. These men wouldn’t know a constitutional act if it bit either of them on the a$$. The government has reportedly maintained that the PA has stopped a total of 54 terrorist acts, 13 of which were supposedly to be conducted on US soil. But when you peel the onion, it didn’t help directly in any of them.