I usually take WND with a grain of salt but this is very plausible.
She deserves the same treatment IMO, this is disgusting.
If true, how plausible is it that her servers were hacked and the info gathered from those emails helped the terrorists set up the attack?
ah ... everyone .... back off of hillary ... She needed to raise money to run for president and giving up Ambassador Stevens was the quickest way for hillary to bring in some money.
The ‘smartest woman in the world’ didn’t anticipate and failed to foresee the security liabilities of using her OWN e mail to correspond with a US Ambassador ... in a dangerous country?
Really???
The guy who empties the waste basket here could wrap his head around THAT one, with NO trouble at all!
Oh well....’What difference does it make?’
"Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public." - HL Mencken
....but she SAID she didn’t use her private emails for government business..../s
I wonder if the server’s email was plain text, or at least somewhat encrypted. Obviously, the former would be extremely incompetent, but at this point, it’s worth wondering about.
50% of Americans are quite happy to *knowingly* elect *traitors* to run this country. 1/2 of the other 50% might object, but they are too ignorant to even know or understand the facts.
The news media worships these traitors while being fully aware of their actions. None of this filth is a secret to them.
Someone explain to me how we are going to fix that.