The split stems from the core answer to the two questions -
Who is God and who is Man?
If you believe Man is god, as Satan proposed in the Garden, then you’ll be a liberal.
LIBERALS ARE SOCIOECONOMIC FASCISTS!
a) “Leftists” pride themselves in being “their brother’s keeper” - which isn’t a bad thing, by definition.
b) Leftists ALSO expect OTHERS to be “their brother’s keeper”
c) Their “brother’s keeper” policies require that others are taxed and CONTROLLED in some way
d) Thus, unwittingly, Leftist policies result in THE USE OF FORCE. (If someone doesn’t pay taxes to fund the Left’s version of their “brother’s keeper’s policies” the IRS will take them at gunpoint to jail).
As the saying goes: “Socialism: Policies so wonderful, you have to use FORCE to implement them!”
As one who cherishes individual rights, I object to the use of force on individuals. Left-wingers also claim to object to the use of force, but they don’t think deeply enough into the ramifications of their policies to realize they are huge proponents of the use of force on individuals to benefit the collective - sometimes in a very greedy manner. Hence the term “greedy liberals.”
That’s why I REFUSE to call them “liberals” because there is nothing “liberal” about their core philosophies. Liberal stems from the word, “liberty” and modern-day Leftists want the “COLLECTIVE” to have CONTROL over the INDIVIDUAL.
Hence, we need to start using the more appropriate term “Socioeconomic Fascists” for people who think they’re “liberals,” because they’re not liberal. They’re FASCISTS.
LIBERALS ARE SOCIOECONOMIC FASCISTS!
a) “Leftists” pride themselves in being “their brother’s keeper” - which isn’t a bad thing, by definition.
b) Leftists ALSO expect OTHERS to be “their brother’s keeper”
c) Their “brother’s keeper” policies require that others are taxed and CONTROLLED in some way
d) Thus, unwittingly, Leftist policies result in THE USE OF FORCE. (If someone doesn’t pay taxes to fund the Left’s version of their “brother’s keeper’s policies” the IRS will take them at gunpoint to jail).
As the saying goes: “Socialism: Policies so wonderful, you have to use FORCE to implement them!”
As one who cherishes individual rights, I object to the use of force on individuals. Left-wingers also claim to object to the use of force, but they don’t think deeply enough into the ramifications of their policies to realize they are huge proponents of the use of force on individuals to benefit the collective - sometimes in a very greedy manner. Hence the term “greedy liberals.”
That’s why I REFUSE to call them “liberals” because there is nothing “liberal” about their core philosophies. Liberal stems from the word, “liberty” and modern-day Leftists want the “COLLECTIVE” to have CONTROL over the INDIVIDUAL.
Hence, we need to start using the more appropriate term “Socioeconomic Fascists” for people who think they’re “liberals,” because they’re NOT liberal! They’re FASCISTS.
Can’t speak for everyone, but for me the difference is: Liberals believe that taking from a group that is “better off” and giving it without effort to a group with fewer financial resources will solve problems. This has been the guiding mantra since the War on Poverty was begun over 50 years ago. Result? The GAO last year said that poverty is worse now than it was 50 years ago. Liberals bash the rich and seek a class warfare. Yet, they are the ones who drive this economic engine. How many of you were hired by a poor person.
They say taxes are too low, but hire high-priced experts to keep their taxes low. When did you last see Bill Mayer write a supplemental check for a million dollars to the IRS? Put up or shut up, Bozo!
Solution: Give a hand up, not a hand out. How does using my tax dollars to give deadbeats a cell phone solve any real problem? Instead, how about: If you draw public assistance, you have two choices: 1) show up at 7AM to clean toilets, sweep the street, or whatever else needs to be done, or 2) enroll in either a training program or the military. That’s it...no other options.
Left and Right: Two sides of the same coin.
Left and Americans: diametrically opposed.
Liberals are totalitarian boot-lickers.
Conservatives are good people.
End of story.
Therefore, if somebody did something bad, it was not their fault. Someone else made them do that. Men and women were exactly the same mentally. Only stronger males had enforced a patriarchy on women suppressing their desires and intellectual development. Ditto for minorities.
That theory, which I believe was leftist originated, has been thoroughly debunked. Humans are hardwired from birth with differences in intelligence and impulses. Different groups of humans around the world have different levels of natural intelligence and physical development.
The leftist version of intelligence holds that humans should not be punished for their crimes but rehabilitated/re-educated. Individuals are not responsible for what they do.
The conservative position holds that rewards for good behavior and punishment for bad behavior is a better way to organize society. Individuals must be held responsible for their actions.
Empathy
Leftists are pure evil, but they need something to work with - something to organize into a political power with which to enslave and ultimately destroy humanity. Liberal moral cowardice is that something.