Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pearls Before Swine
I took this to mean that however high the cost of the drug is, the patient will not pay more than $250/month of the cost.

That would mean the pharmaceutical companies can charge whatever they want for the drugs, and only those who can afford their $250/month part of the cost can use it. It sounds like a lose-lose for the the consumer and a win for the pharmaceutical and insurance industry.

3 posted on 05/23/2015 6:00:56 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: grania

It’s not a lose for the consumer who needs Sovaldi but can’t afford its true cost of $1,000 a pill with a total treatment cost of $84,000.


6 posted on 05/23/2015 6:07:59 AM PDT by RoosterRedux (WSC: The truth is incontrovertible; malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: grania

You’re probably right, and I mis-read it.

Still $3000 extra annually for drug coverage co-pay is a new charge; and I bet it’s a “means-tested” charge which means anyone with any spare change left pays it, while those getting assisted don’t.

Obama’s goal seems to be to get almost everyone supported by the government in some way or other by raising prices to those outside of the government “club.” Kinda clever, in a diabolical way.


13 posted on 05/23/2015 6:57:34 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson