I disagree with that. Legally he is guilty of nothing while his accuser is guilty of falsely reporting a crime, and the university is guilty of facilitating the demonization of the victim. Morally I find his unsound judgement and fornication to be far less outrageous than the “mattress girl’s” campaign to bear false witness against him and destroy him. I also find his actions to be miles less outrageous than the feminist movement’s attempt to turn an accusation of sexual assault into the next “racism” where the accused becomes dehumanized simply by virtue of the accusation.
He was never charged with any crime.
The University cleared him of her accusations.
He sexually used and abused an emotionally disturbed girl. It wasn’t illegal, but it was immoral.
You sow what you reap.
Next he will be complaining a prostitute gave him VD.
He chose to be a part of this insane and dark world of his own volition.
He continues in this cycle of vanity with his lawsuit.
He can’t walk away, repent and change his ways but is as tied to it as the mattress girl.