Replies

To: NorthMountain

Therefore . . . what? Stand back and let the Muslims do their thing, so to speak?

I said God can (and will) avenge Himself, did I not? (Deuteronomy 32:35; Romans 12:19)

12 posted on 05/18/2015 10:59:34 AM PDT by Olog-hai

To: Olog-hai

Therefore objecting to Charlie Hebdo's output as blasphemous has nothing to do with Mad Mo. It is blasphemous, and yes, The Lord will deal with it.

Can we stand to call things by their right name?

Charlie Hebdo: Crude, vulgar, obscene, and often blasphemous.

Mohammedans: Violent murderers, rapists, torturers, vandals and thieves.

13 posted on 05/18/2015 11:06:46 AM PDT by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")

To: Olog-hai

BTW, I'm a bit curious about something:

Is there some reason you didn't actually answer my question as to whether the anti-Christian cartoons qualify as "blasphemous"?

14 posted on 05/18/2015 11:08:23 AM PDT by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794