I am not saying that 0bama is a noted truth teller but I am not sure if the article is entirely true.
The circle of people who would know some of this to be lies would be large.
There was no DNA test?
The Paki’s knew where he was for years and helped us?
I don’t know.
>> I am not saying that 0bama is a noted truth teller but I am not sure if the article is entirely true <<
Agreed. But Hersh raises very important matters, which need to be thoroughly vetted by reporters with greater reliability than old Sy.
Believe it or not, I read the original Hersh article in the London mag — in spite of the fact that doing so would seem to contravene a common FR practice whereby we seldom read actual sources. And I gotta say that lot of Hersh’s account rings true.
For example, did a few ISI big-wigs know in advance about the raid and could they have facilitated it by some of the actions described by Hersh?
That scenario seems a lot more likely to me than the Obama version, which says the Paks were kept completely in the dark.
I’m not gonna maintain, however, that Hersh is 100% credible. The latter part of the article betrays a rabid anti-CIA and rabid “anti-torture” agenda, whose claims are just a little too pat for me to accept. So let’s hope researchers who are more objective will eventually be able to tell us the whole truth.