“Because of the use of the Internet, we could have little or no notice in advance of an independent actor attempting to strike.”
Say what?! Because of the use of the Internet? Oh man what a stretch. An Independent actor by definition is INDEPENDENT, The Internet is not going to assist in detecting him/her unless they have compatriots/confidants and are stupid enough to use the Internet to communicate with them.
Now on the other hand if they are not ‘independent’ but long term embedded agents just waiting for activation orders, his comment might make sense then.
On the other-other hand to me this looks just like the justification of more ‘police-state’ actions in watching ‘everyone’ in the name of “War on ________” Drugs, Terrorism or whatever the flavor of the day ‘ism’.
“on the other hand if they are not ‘independent’ but long term embedded agents just waiting for activation orders”
aka, “sleeper cells”
Jeh, Hussein and all the traitors want to control the internet to get websites like this one tossed into the dustbin of history.
It’s ALL their sorry asses that need to be tossed ‘sooner, rather than (too) later’.
What’s the difference between an independent actor and a struggling one?
Unless one KNOWS the internet is sucked-up, tracked, analyzed, decoded, stored, sifted, mined...All while denying the same (eh, who needs the 4th anyway, right? If you got nothing to hide...).