Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schweizer: I’m Skeptical of Wealth Accumulation of All Elected Officials
Breitbart ^ | 3 May 2015 | Pam Key

Posted on 05/03/2015 12:44:53 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: E. Pluribus Unum

I hate it when you have a person who held office and even though they are no longer serving they still call them “Governor” or “Congressman.”

That’s BS. When you go you leave that Title behind.

I don’t know where, but it’s in the Constitution that Titles are not to be given to citizens.


21 posted on 05/03/2015 3:32:34 PM PDT by Noamie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

start with Charlie Rangel....
he walked out of korea with a bronze star and five bucks in his pocket. Made no money for a law firm then...shazam - beats Adam Clayton Powell and inherits all Powell’s contacts and money men.


22 posted on 05/03/2015 3:44:32 PM PDT by stylin19a (obama = Eddie Mush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver
I don't see Palin choosing Walker over her man Cruz.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

23 posted on 05/03/2015 3:58:18 PM PDT by ansel12 (LEGAL immigrants, 30 million 1980-2012, continues to remake the nation's electorate for democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Oh, I’m not skeptical, I know exactly how feinstein and her ilk on both sides build their wealth off of their positions of trust.


24 posted on 05/03/2015 4:26:29 PM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

“Then there are about one hundred other changes that should be made including drastically limiting the amount of money they (and their PACs) can spend on election campaigns.”

Do that, and the media decides who gets elected, because they have no limits on how much they can do to favor one candidate over the other.


25 posted on 05/03/2015 5:49:32 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009

“They make way more through insider information on the stock markets.”

And yet, we’d go to jail for this. But they’re special, worthy and entitled. Pewlosi is worth over $100 million...and this woman is as dumb as a load of watermelons. How’d she do this? Her intelligence? Right.


26 posted on 05/03/2015 6:43:52 PM PDT by WKUHilltopper (And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ziravan
I’m not saying it’s right. I’m saying that being privy to every major and minor investment opportunity in your area means you accumulate wealth, or you’re not trying to do so.

That little gem was worth the price of admission. Quite a good (and simple) explanation of how things work politically.

27 posted on 05/04/2015 12:40:44 AM PDT by SandwicheGuy (*The butter acts as a lubricant and speeds up the CPU*ou)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009
They make way more through insider information on the stock markets.

Sweetheart land deals are really popular as well.  It's a really easy way to launder bribes.

28 posted on 05/04/2015 6:06:36 AM PDT by zeugma ( The Clintons Could Find a Loophole in a Stop Sign)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson