Because most of that money went DIRECTLY to the pockets of connected Democrats, NOT “helping the people”.
Keep that mess in Maryland.
The man is an idiot. He has demonstrated that they do not know how to turn 130 mil into something. In business you take any amount of capital and the game is to turn it into more.
If they have nothing to show with 130 mil more will not help except to end up in the pockets of the leadership.
And when it's transferred from working whites to thugs then it will be transferred to the drug lords....and the cycle starts again...infinity.
I was in a hotel in Seattle with the news on. A woman was being interviewed and she wailed, “we give the homeless free shelter, medical and food. Why...Oh, why do we still have a homeless problem?” I came out of the bathroom to watch the newsman slam her down. He just made an affirming noise as she continued.
You have poverty because you are giving people money instead of making it easy for businesses to employ them.
Money doesn’t fix what’s broken in Baltimore.
That works out to $6.5 million per year. Which wouldn't cover Obama's White House entertainment budget. Sure they don't mean "billion"?
“A spit in the bucket”....so was he asked how much would be enough? 300 Million? 1 Billion? 50 Trillion? When someone quantifies their answer in such a way, the follow up should be, “Well, then how much would it take?”.
HA. Dumping tax payer money in to Baltimore DID transform Baltimore. Section 8 and welfare people moved in, successful people who built the city left. The surest way to destroy a city is to dump welfare money in to it.
Why in the world should we pour our money into a city where the residents routinely burn down and loot buildings and businesses. Only a retard would do that.
Libeals running baltimore for 50 plusmyears. Thats whats wrong.
If you buy the argument that Baltimore schools really need more money why is Obama giving BILLIONS of dollars to illegal immigrants instead of his loyal constituents?