Skip to comments.
Limiting global warming to 2 degrees 'inadequate', scientists say
Reuters via Yahoo! News ^
| May 1, 2015
| By Laurie Goering
Posted on 05/01/2015 9:04:56 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Yeah, like in the billions of years of the earth’s history, the climate never varied by two degree or more. (snicker)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I think we should tie the limit of global warming to the minimum wage.
3
posted on
05/01/2015 9:08:45 AM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
To: driftless2
By “worst impacts” do they mean things like a British wine industry, farming in Greenland, and other things we had in the Medieval Climate Optimum before the Little Ice Age?
4
posted on
05/01/2015 9:09:17 AM PDT
by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
To: UCANSEE2
TIME Magazine, June 24, 1974:
“...the weather aberrations may be the harbinger of another ice age.”
5
posted on
05/01/2015 9:10:51 AM PDT
by
Eric in the Ozarks
("If he were working for the other side, what would he be doing differently ?")
To: Oldeconomybuyer
When are these loons going to be hauled off to a padded cell?
6
posted on
05/01/2015 9:13:07 AM PDT
by
Tucker39
(Welcome to America! Now speak English; and keep to the right....In driving, in Faith, and politics.)
To: Tucker39
That’s what they want to the sane “deniers”!
To: Oldeconomybuyer
in a series of reports commissioned by the Climate Vulnerable Forum, a group of 20 countries chaired by the Philippines. "We wants more Free Food & Climate Stamps!"
8
posted on
05/01/2015 9:15:29 AM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Tucker39
City of Baltimore may have some vehicles better suited to the task available soon...
9
posted on
05/01/2015 9:16:33 AM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
(Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
To: Tucker39
10
posted on
05/01/2015 9:16:50 AM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
(Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
This silly theory is based on at least three "facts" not in evidence:
1. The earth is actually warming,
2. The warming is primary caused by human activity,
3. Man has the ability to reverse this warming.
11
posted on
05/01/2015 9:19:40 AM PDT
by
Menehune56
("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
To: Oldeconomybuyer
12
posted on
05/01/2015 9:21:25 AM PDT
by
Raycpa
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Yea. Scientists
Cherry picked and Marxist in their beliefs
13
posted on
05/01/2015 9:22:28 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: The_Reader_David
Well obviously, after the four hundred year warm period when the earth’s temp warmed by about five degrees, all life was destroyed, and we don’t exist. (snicker)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly - it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over. Joseph Goebbels
15
posted on
05/01/2015 9:32:13 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
But the draconian measures advocated by, for example, Governor Moonbeam, will have a whopping .02 degree impact on temperatire. For that we will ruin our economy. What idiocy.
16
posted on
05/01/2015 9:39:31 AM PDT
by
beethovenfan
(If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer; All
And people who believe in God are called ‘unscientific’ and superstitious’....Lordy if these AGW zealots aren’t practicing a religion I don’t know what else to call it
17
posted on
05/01/2015 9:39:38 AM PDT
by
Nifster
To: Oldeconomybuyer
How do these people say this this with a straight face?????
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I am waiting for some climate scientist to publish a paper on what the optimum climate is for our biosphere. The first question that would naturally flow would be where is our current trend in relation to this finding.
That nobody seems interested in this vital comparison indicates that the climate is being studied for other purposes. Since all the urgent demands that flow from today’s climate science all converge on policy solutions that involve statism, bigger government, higher taxes, less personal liberty, the bigger picture tells me all that I need to know about “climate science”. It is socialism and Gaia worship by other means.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Wow, it was 5 degrees hotter just yesterday we are all dead!
20
posted on
05/01/2015 9:49:57 AM PDT
by
American in Israel
(A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson