Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Don't know what to say. Build a dam then.
1 posted on 04/25/2015 7:34:42 AM PDT by Mean Daddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
To: Mean Daddy

I’ve never heard any desalination proponent claim that desal would “instantly” solve the water shortage.


2 posted on 04/25/2015 7:40:08 AM PDT by Bob (No, being a US Senator and the Secretary of State are not accomplishments; they're jobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mean Daddy

The cost of water from same doesn’t look too bad, ~ 3x other sources. As for ecological impact ...... consider LA itself.


4 posted on 04/25/2015 7:43:15 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mean Daddy
Santa Barbara, (desal plant) completed in 1992, the rains had returned; the facility went through a few weeks of pilot testing, then was mothballed and partially dismantled.

That is not true. Ionics operated the plant and sold water to the City for a period of time so as to recoup their investment. This was a contractually agreed to requirement.

(I worked with Ionics at the time and my employer (Ingersol Rand) sold much of the equipment that was used for the plant.)

6 posted on 04/25/2015 7:45:19 AM PDT by Michael.SF. (If Hillary was running against Satan, I'd probably abstain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mean Daddy

Lefties: and Stop trying to remove the existing Klamath River Dams that produce , green, electrical energy and water to farmers.

Stop flushing fresh water to allegedly save a few smelt fish.

Stop trying to steal so much of your neighbors’ water.


7 posted on 04/25/2015 7:46:22 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mean Daddy; EveningStar
As big industrial facilities, desalination plants can't be plunked down just anywhere on the coast without destroying the qualities that attract people to the shoreline.

This is what it comes down to. The rich snots don't want lose their million dollar views of the Pacific.

I say put the plant right in the heart of the Malibu Colony. Those folks are among the most obnoxious people on the face of the planet.

And as far as the California Coastal Commission is concerned -- it is time to end it's reign of terror. Close it.

8 posted on 04/25/2015 7:48:37 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mean Daddy

Will all you poor, ugly, untalented, resource-snatching people just get the hell out of California!

Your Democratic Party gods demand it!


10 posted on 04/25/2015 7:49:42 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mean Daddy

Desalination plants will never work in California.

It’s too far from the ocean...


12 posted on 04/25/2015 7:52:06 AM PDT by null and void (He who kills a tyrant (i.e. an usurper) to free his country is praised and rewarded ~ Thomas Aquinas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mean Daddy

“would solve our water supply problems instantly and permanently”

Utterly typical lib argumentation tactic. Nobody at all is saying that desal plants would any problem instantly. You can ignore the rest of the article.


15 posted on 04/25/2015 7:53:54 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mean Daddy

It's working just fine in Tampa, FL, and providing 25 million gallons of fresh water a day.

16 posted on 04/25/2015 7:55:14 AM PDT by JPG (Lefty reporters doing battle with Sen. Cruz will continue to be chewed-up and spit-out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mean Daddy

Stop heating buildings in SFO with drinking water steam.


17 posted on 04/25/2015 7:57:12 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mean Daddy

A much better idea is to waste billions on a high-speed rail.


18 posted on 04/25/2015 7:58:56 AM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mean Daddy
Let's take a look at the hard realities. As big industrial facilities, desalination plants can't be plunked down just anywhere on the coast without destroying the qualities that attract people to the shoreline.

And there you have the real reason: the well to do that live on the coastline don't want their views spoiled. And besides, If more water is available it will just attract more people to California.

19 posted on 04/25/2015 8:00:00 AM PDT by oldbrowser (We have a rogue government in Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mean Daddy
Yeah! Screw desalination plants and clean water! More money for the choo-choo bullet train and benefits to illegals!

"California....knows how to party. California...knows how to party! In da city....city of Compton. We keep it rockin! We keep it rockin!" < /Tupac >

20 posted on 04/25/2015 8:02:02 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (ANYBODY BUT FRICKING JEB AND HILLARY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mean Daddy
Literally Millions of Californians live in what used to be a desert. The only reason it is not now a desert is because the aqueduct system brings millions of gallons of water into that valley from somewhere else. Either more water needs brought in or lots of people need to leave the valley. There is no other alternative.

Desalination is something that will help. That is why the left is against it.

22 posted on 04/25/2015 8:05:32 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mean Daddy

One of the progressives favorite words is “sustainability”.

The current population is not sustainable in a desert state like California. Perhaps we should send a few million back to Mexico?


24 posted on 04/25/2015 8:10:42 AM PDT by Senator_Blutarski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mean Daddy

If they don’t want water from the Pacific, build a pipeline from Lake Superior.


29 posted on 04/25/2015 8:28:13 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mean Daddy

All I know is I don’t want the fruits and nuts moving east when they run out of water. We don’t want them here.


30 posted on 04/25/2015 8:28:46 AM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mean Daddy

Deporting the millions of illegals who use water would solve the other half of the problem.


31 posted on 04/25/2015 8:30:24 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mean Daddy

The writer is a liberal idiot. The real solution is cheap 4th generation nuclear plants combined with desalinization. Just won’t happen in California.


33 posted on 04/25/2015 8:36:54 AM PDT by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mean Daddy

The Left doesn’t quite have a policy or slogans on desalinization yet - but you can see it being formed.

The answer will be “No” and “it won’t solve anything.”


36 posted on 04/25/2015 8:53:07 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson