It appears that “living” confuses her more than “fetus.”
(a) an intact fetus with a heartbeat or some other form of ‘life,’
(b) disarticulated fetus with a heartbeat or some other sign of ‘life”’)
Does this ever happen except by abortion??
(c) simply a collection of living cells
This one clearly can’t be right. There is either a full head or more, or the legs and the trunk past the navel. So it can’t be just a collection of living cells.
(d) living fetus as “pulsing umbilical cord” or heartbeat
Does this ever happen and (a) not happen? Are there any doctors/nurses out there?
I must say this law is extraordinarily specific compared to many others I have read. If the law is unconstitutional, then THOUSANDS of others need to be wiped off the books too.
Nobody who 'wants' a child ever says they're having a "fetus"....or "I'm having an unborn"....their pregnancy announcements always say..."we're having a baby!"
God made certain things in life pretty simple and easily understood....only man makes them into something they are not.
What I never can figure out is why late term abortion is easier on the mother than simply let the birth happen.