Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MeshugeMikey

When I’m at my ‘most weak & vulnerable’, decrepit & meeting my own terms, I do not wish upon my family bearing witness to my tortured death & humiliation, themselves tortured in the process.

There is NO argument that can remove my right and, thus, the need exists for a legal alternative for my friends and/or family to carry out my wishes.

.02


5 posted on 04/18/2015 6:39:58 AM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: logi_cal869

“Right to die” WILL become “DUTY to die”. The camel’s nose, FRiend. Be careful what you wish for...


7 posted on 04/18/2015 6:48:59 AM PDT by Don W ( When most riot, neighborhoods and cities burn. When Whites riot, nations and continents burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: logi_cal869
Logi-cal, there's a very legitimate case to be made for refusing treatment which is truly burdensome and futile. Gotta agree with no ventilator, no electroshock, no aggressive CPR when it would be a terrifying, rib-breaking experience for a fragile terminal patient who cannot benefit.

However, that's not what this legislation is about. It's about lethal drug overdoses prescribed by death-docs who aren't even qualified to diagnose depression.

And the only "protection" in all these laws --- which mirror Oregon's law --- is for the prescribing doctor, not the patient. The law protects the doctor from lawsuit, even if there's evidence of coercion on the part of a death-promoting heir (giving grim new significance to the saying "Where there's a will, there's a way.")

The drug-pushing doctor cannot be sued if he claims he acted in "good faith," a claim it is practically impossible to disprove in court, unless he actually took a bribe in front of a witness.

Anyone who wants to commit suicide on their own can do so, and 30 minutes' worth of mousing around on the Internet can tell you how.

But don't insist on "authorization" or "participation" from church or state or medico or politico. Surely in the name of autonomy, a would-be suicider can take care of business without insisting on corrupting the political, legal, and medical professions.

A self-respecting suicider (I am not recommending this) should be responsible for himself. This "legalized" "physician-assisted" crap just puts more death-dealing power in the hands of the State.

14 posted on 04/18/2015 5:41:45 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (I am impelled, not to squeak like a grateful and apologetic mouse, but to roar like a lion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: logi_cal869
Well, don't expect a doctor to do it for you. No doctor worth anything is going to kill someone.

Sounds like a job for a lawyer, who doesn't have a conscience to hurt.

16 posted on 04/18/2015 6:46:21 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson