Posted on 04/17/2015 10:14:44 AM PDT by Kaslin
I like this.
100% dittos.
Brilliant.
Poisoning the well with rightousness!
I LOVE IT!
It’s cute and catchy, but it’s not a real solution. A business should be able to serve who they want, and it’s not the government’s business. Government should butt out. If the business is wacko it’ll go out of business.
That works as a last resort.
But we need to work to get the laws in place that nobody should ever have to participate in a religious ceremony, quasi-religious ceremony, or mockery of a religious ceremony that they object to by virtue of having offered business services to the public.
And as far as the bread and breakfast scenario, you’d probably have to have a clear definition of what is a bread and breakfast vs a hotel. With a bread and breakfast being provided more protections than a hotel.
Yes! Great strategy!
It’s the perfect solution.
And don't say anything about wearing crucifixes or rosary bracelets or whatever. JUST DO IT. Then if the happy couple objected to what the servers wore they'd be violating their rights.
Keep it simple. Turn it around.
That’s going to do absolutely nothing ... they’ll be laughing at all the money that the owner is not getting and having to service them anyway!
A great way to ‘turn the other cheek’ (double entenendre intended) on gay terrorist activists in America.
I keep seeing this described as a viable option, but how does the business prevent being ruined financially by a long stream of such requests? Give the homofascists a way to destroy you, and they surely will.
Also, the “shaming” publicly, by name, of the homofascists will end up in court, and the business will lose, unless the homofascists agree to it in the contract.
This idea treats the symptom - but does not deter the disease that will kill the patient before long.
” Its cute and catchy, but its not a real solution. “
No solution at all, but it would be interesting to try a few times.
Right! It doesn't indict, try, convict, and sentence the traitorous officials in the government.
**And then inform them that all of the money that they pay for the services will be donated to a traditional pro-family lobby.**
Nope.
The party requesting services has to pay for said services by sending a check to a traditional pro-family lobby. Make THEM write the check. Put it in the contract.
“Its cute and catchy, but its not a real solution. A business should be able to serve who they want, and its not the governments business. Government should butt out. If the business is wacko itll go out of business.”
The 1964 Civil Rights Act just keeps on giving.
I like your approach. The gay community lives to rub conservative’s faces in their “gay rights”. Let them think they’re winning then stick it to them. If nothing else, anyone serious about their vows won’t want Christians front and center so it might deter them.
It’s not shaming gays to publish their names as donors.
It doesn’t have to be the full profit, just a portion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.