Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thetallguy24

RP is big on the Constitution supposedly.

The Constitution does not mention a word on marriage.

Marriage should therefore be regulated by the states if the Constitution still carries any weight.


3 posted on 04/13/2015 11:58:51 AM PDT by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines

A constitutional ammendment should have been passed on what constitutes a family. Otherwise all Hell breaks loose. What if Utah says a man can marry multiple wives? Or Kentucky says you can marry brothers and sisters?


11 posted on 04/13/2015 12:01:46 PM PDT by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines

The federal government has had it’s own relationship with marriage from the very first, even with the Continental congress, there are marriage decisions regarding the military, federal employment, immigration, and today, foreign policy.

Rand Paul is running for federal office, not state office, we need to know what his positions are because he will be making decisions at the federal level.

Obama just approved gay marriage for the military for example.


21 posted on 04/13/2015 12:08:25 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines

...or not regulated by the government at all.


26 posted on 04/13/2015 12:18:49 PM PDT by WayneS (Barack Obama makes Neville Chamberlin look like George Patton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson