Posted on 04/09/2015 11:47:39 AM PDT by Olog-hai
State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf sounded a dismissive tone Wednesday about warnings from two former secretaries of state about the nuclear agreement negotiated with Iran, saying she saw lots of big words and big thoughts in their evaluation but not a lot of alternatives.
Harf was asked during her daily press briefing about a Wall Street Journal column by Henry Kissinger and George Schultz, which a reporter pointed out raised a lot of questions about the deal.
I think their piece was a little more nuanced than that, Harf said, then also disputed another reporters suggestion that the assessment by the former secretaries of state was pretty damning.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
There are lots of alternatives to their blunt choice of destruction for Israel.
Agreement that gives Iran the bomb.
No agreement that gives Iran the bomb.
Yes, there actually is a good alternative to this agreement.
There’s an even better one too. Bomb Irans nuclear sites until they beg for mercy.
Poor Maria! So much blond hair and so little under it.
There really is no point in asking Marie Harf anything. All she does is repeat Obama talking points and deny anything and everything.
Upon hearing the “big words” and “big thoughts”, did Harf want to retreat to a Safe Space?
"Math is hard..."
- Barbie
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.