Posted on 04/07/2015 8:24:20 PM PDT by jazusamo
Federal judge refuses appeal, criticizes president’s lawyers for misleading the court
President Obama’s new deportation amnesty will remain halted, a federal judge in Texas ruled Tuesday night in an order that also delivered a judicial spanking to the president’s lawyers for misleading the court.
Judge Andrew S. Hanen, who first halted the amnesty in February, just two days before it was to take effect, said he’s even more convinced of his decision now,...
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Can he put Bammy in the Clink for contempt?
If only he could, it would be a hoot.
Thank you Judge Hanen.
Judge Hanen ,one brave hero standing up to the communist/democrat tyrant
funny how the news media is hiding this trial
Full Title and subtitle frames it right:
“Obama deportation amnesty to remain halted; judge says lawyers lied to him” - Federal judge refuses appeal to let deportation halt continue, relying on Obama’s own words”
bttt
Does this settle the issue for a good while?
Until the merits of the States’ case can be heard?
Why not print this questionaire up encircle your answers and send it to your US Senator
Dear Senator
INS...Amnesty.. Forget about Ebola
We don’t allow cattle to enter without a background health and ancestry check which we also reqiure of legal immigrants who wait years and still go thru health and record checks. We also require that any legal immingrant demonstrate prior to entry that they offer a contribution to our society and not dependency upon it .
Yet we’re letting children and gang bangers in without doing any of this which has resulted in dispersing virulent new diseases (measles) and drug use which has resulted in unreported cases in schools where these illegal kids were placed.. Plus shoved a severe financial strain on local governments where they are placed .
Should any candidate for Attorney General supporting that practice be denied confirmation ?(Yes) (No) . Should the senate reject any such candidate to be Attorney General by applying the simple majority Reid rule citing the Hanen court injunction ruling that would restrict the use of the Reid rule only when such a ruling by a Judge were made ? (Yes) (No) (don’t know what Reid rule means)
Should those given this bypassed favored treatment who miss their INS hearing be deported fortwith ? (Y) (N).. ? Denied re-entry (Y)(N) ? Snould that also apply to any illegal convicted of a felony (Y)(N)
In “countries where an American citizen decides to be a “legal” emigree never mind being a seasonal visitor still are denied voting privledges. Own land in their own name. Face steep fines before getting kicked out let alone denied income and energy subsistance including food stamps, or bring in family members .
I (do) (don’t) believe we should allow such full citizenship privledges mentioned above which are denied by the country of national origin of the above, to a legal American immigrant , deny such full citizen privledges to any (emigree) (seasonal vistor) (illegal) if their country does not allow those same privledges to any citizen of the United States, .
While such a position will be condemed as defacto deportation particularly by the political establishment .Would you continue to support a Senator who refuses to support such restrictions ? (Y) (N) Does that also include erecting border barriers such as fencing designed to discourage surrepticious or uncontolled entry ? (Yes) (No)
Should any American citizen which goes overseas to join a foreign entity fighting against the United States (such as ISIS) Be denied re-entry (Y)(N) and their citizenship revoked? (Y) (N) Should that person be charged with treason (Y)(N)
Very Truly Yours For Restoring the value of American citizenship and Conservative Government
Include your return address label below along with your signature and date
Ok no deportations,does not say anything about importation,now thousands of illegal alien children are being flown into the country at taxpayer expense from countries in central America,now they won’t be deported
I was inquiring on another thread about this case just yesterday. There is a big difference in the case they ruled on yesterday and this one.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3276696/posts
Correct, there is a big difference.
As I understand it the appeal of Judge Hanen’s ruling is still scheduled to he heard in the 5th Circuit and “standing” was the main issue in the other one.
Some seem to think standing will be in this one also, others don’t. I don’t know but am looking forward to the outcome and dearly hope they uphold Judge Hanen.
Great piece from Conservative Treehouse
Excellent piece, thanks for linking.
0bama is outclassed in a big way by Judge Hanen. The good judge uses his head and intellect while 0bama suffers diarrhea of the mouth from lack of brain power.
I’m betting 0bama is livid. lol
Any one have proof that Obama halted anything? Didn't think so.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.