Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grundle

I don’t understand why california doesn’t build them by the dozen.


2 posted on 04/05/2015 11:12:06 AM PDT by Ouderkirk (To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ouderkirk

Because the endangered sand gopher wouldn’t like it.


9 posted on 04/05/2015 11:18:48 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Ouderkirk

California should, indeed, have built them by the dozen twenty years ago, but there are environmental laws that are hurdles. I am not anti-environment, but am opposed to STUPID environmental laws.
Think of all the plants and animals DYING OFF because of the drought. I shudder for the Redwoods, and the Sierra Club should too.


10 posted on 04/05/2015 11:19:37 AM PDT by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Ouderkirk
I don’t understand why california doesn’t build them by the dozen.

1. Because 25 jellyfish a year are killed by this process. 2. Because they would have to quit whining about the Global Warm caused drought.

11 posted on 04/05/2015 11:21:05 AM PDT by Starstruck (If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarca only ones we can gesm or criticism...or do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Ouderkirk

Because the federal government has been blocking them and Texas since the 1980s.

I take it that you are new to watching this technology.


13 posted on 04/05/2015 11:23:33 AM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Ouderkirk
I don’t understand why california doesn’t build them by the dozen.

Because to the demented liberals, gaia worshippers and moonbeam, it makes more sense to build a bullet train to nowhere anybody wants to go.

15 posted on 04/05/2015 11:23:56 AM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Ouderkirk

Why not do a little research instead of baying at the moon?


16 posted on 04/05/2015 11:25:25 AM PDT by Misterioso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Ouderkirk
I don’t understand why California doesn’t build them by the dozen.

It's because Israel is run by grown-ups, while California is run by corrupt children. Just imagine if Jerry Brown were prime minister of Israel. There'd be a half-finished bullet train running from the Golan Heights to the Sinai Desert. It would be over-budget by a factor of three.

And there would be no water.

18 posted on 04/05/2015 11:26:29 AM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Ouderkirk

Santa Barbara built a desalination plant in 1991, then the rains hit, and they mothballed it in 1992, now they are reopening it and Carlsbad is building the largest desalination plant in the Western hemisphere.

In 2011 the United States, along with Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Spain was among the top 4 markets for desalinated water, it isn’t like we don’t know about it, or won’t incorporate it as the market dictates.

“Despite these hurdles, however, the United States ranks fourth among markets for desalinated water behind Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Spain, according to an International Desalination Association presentation from 2011.”

http://www.bna.com/us-desalination-industry-n17179876105/


21 posted on 04/05/2015 11:31:47 AM PDT by ansel12 (Palin--Mr President, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Ouderkirk

Tampa Bay Seawater Desalination Plant

The Tampa Bay Seawater Desalination facility is a drought-proof, alternative water supply that provides up to 25 million gallons per day of drinking water to the region.

Seawater coming into the plant goes through a rigorous pretreatment process then freshwater is separated from the seawater using reverse osmosis. The end product is high-quality drinking water that supplies up to 10 percent of the region’s needs.

http://www.tampabaywater.org/tampa-bay-seawater-desalination-plant/index.aspx


22 posted on 04/05/2015 11:32:00 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Ouderkirk

Israel, 8,000 square miles and a population of 8 million. Powers desalination with nuclear power.

California 163,000 square miles, population of 38 million and no one willing to store nuclear waste in “my back yard.”


24 posted on 04/05/2015 11:33:21 AM PDT by Regal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Ouderkirk
California spends a fortune bringing illegals here, housing them, feeding them and educating their kids...

There's no money left for things like desalination plants. Besides, the liberal elites will have plenty of water to fill their swimming pools ...

So it's no big deal.

26 posted on 04/05/2015 11:37:25 AM PDT by GOPJ (DHS has the same budget as the USMC and has TWICE their headcount - - freeper gaijin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Ouderkirk

by the dozens is right. and they should have been building a long time ago.
israel has about 8 million people. Cali has about 38 million.
israel land size is about 8k square miles. cali is 163k square miles.


35 posted on 04/05/2015 12:21:16 PM PDT by stylin19a (obama = Eddie Mush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Ouderkirk

America has been comfortable for too long. When you are insulated from reality you make decisions that are divorced from reality.


40 posted on 04/05/2015 12:47:23 PM PDT by WMarshal (“A man’s rights rest in three boxes. The ballot box, jury box, and the cartridge" - F. Douglass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Ouderkirk
I don’t understand why california doesn’t build them by the dozen.

Texas too but it's easy to figure why Cali doesn't. Water restrictions are part of the socialist reach for control. You Californians will be told long after the drought is over that drought conditions still exist so the government can control your watering and planting. The environazis will do the Left's bidding on this one and claim the plants create environmental hazards if built that will damage the ecostructure blah blah.

42 posted on 04/05/2015 1:05:56 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (Every time you say no to a liberal, you make the Baby Barack cry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Ouderkirk

They (desalination plants) are too expensive to build...but the same people are for a high speed rail system that costs twice as much. A defunct concrete plant was to be converted to desalination and was beaten down by the environmentalists. And a dam that would save the water now flowing to the sea is opposed because of possible harm to a fish not even indigent to California. These people deserve their fate, they have earned it.


55 posted on 04/05/2015 3:27:44 PM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag ($$$$$ Don't Defund the Government...Defund Obama and his illegal policies $$$$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson