Posted on 04/04/2015 8:30:59 AM PDT by Olog-hai
Whites in the United States approve of police officers hitting people in far greater numbers than blacks and Hispanics do, at a time when the country is struggling to deal with police use of deadly force against men of color, according to a major American trend survey.
Seven of 10 whites polled, or 70 percent, said they can imagine a situation in which they would approve of a police officer striking an adult male citizen, according to the 2014 General Social Survey, a long-running measurement of trends in American opinions. When asked the same questionAre there any situations you can imagine in which you would approve of a policeman striking an adult male citizen?42 percent of blacks and 38 percent of Hispanics said they could.
(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...
I heard Inga Bartz....”sitting in” for Mark Levin commenting on this just yesterday. She wondered just how such a poll could have been conducted.
Why do I think “Jesse Holland” is Amish?
Who attacks or kills most police officers?
Yep, Amish
>>Seven of 10 whites polled, or 70 percent, said they can imagine a situation in which they would approve of a police officer striking an adult male citizen, according to the 2014 General Social Survey, a long-running measurement of trends in American opinions. When asked the same questionAre there any situations you can imagine in which you would approve of a policeman striking an adult male citizen?42 percent of blacks and 38 percent of Hispanics said they could.
The survey should also ask, “Can you imagine a situation where you would strike an adult male.” I bet the percentages along racial lines would be reversed.
I am in complete awe that anyone, even a prison inmate, could not imagine situations "which you would approve of a policeman striking an adult male citizen?"
(This is from someone who is half a world and decades away from believing that "nice Mr. Policeman is your friend!")
Who is struggling?
The same thought occurred to me as well.
“She wondered just how such a poll could have been conducted.”
Crookedly....
Stupid poll. Leaves out circumstances. Better would be “Could you approve of an officer hitting a citizen who is resisting arrest? How about if the alternative is shooting him?”
Interesting thought.
And likely true.
Not stupid.
Stupid respondents that simply can’t envision ANY situation under ANY condition that would make it appropriate for a police officer to strike an adult.
Astoundingly revealing.
Urban folks more likely amused by The Knockout Game.
Earth-shattering, huh..?
Skull-shattering too, possibly.
A stupid question.
As asked, I can imagine it, and can also imagine situations for a Starbucks clerk or a school teacher, or a mailman.
Let’s put a real shoot no shoot scenario up, man raises a claw hammer to get ready to hit the baby he is holding in the head.
Do you shoot and probably kill him to save the baby or continue trying to use harsh language?
If you fail that scenario, you should not become a police officer.
And yes, those things are done in video simulations.
DK
Fixed it.
Counselor, what’sa Yute?
That's a "Youth", pronounced with a NY/NJ/Chicago accent.
AKA - a full-grown thug who might be just shy of his/her eighteenth birthday.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.