Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

It is almost impossible to learn the truth about Iran and the Obama Administration. This article gives an interesting perspective.
1 posted on 04/03/2015 1:34:55 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: detective

Of course they do. Luckily, the Israelis have both nuclear and THERMOnuclear warheads.


2 posted on 04/03/2015 1:36:17 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can help: https://www.tedcruz.org/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Now we know what all those tunnels coming over from Gaza are for.


3 posted on 04/03/2015 1:38:50 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (If obama speaks and th<uere is no one the<ire to hear it, is it still a lie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Could very well be the case. The whole point of double-secret underground R&D labs is so outsiders don’t actually know what the state of development is. “Negotiating” such an outrageous “deal” gives Iran a schedule for revealing creation of such weapons with plausible deniability.

Very plausible theory, with the only caveat being: methinks they’d not hesitate to use ‘em ASAP once they had ‘em and can figure out how to reliably deliver ‘em.


4 posted on 04/03/2015 1:39:43 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (Si vis pacem, para bellum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

So Obama is trying to “legitimize the ones they have”?


5 posted on 04/03/2015 1:42:07 PM PDT by GraceG (Protect the Border from Illegal Aliens, Don't Protect Illegal Alien Boarders...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

We are living a real life Breaking Bad and I’m not looking forward to the final episodes.


6 posted on 04/03/2015 1:42:11 PM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Countries with Nuclear Weapons Capability

Acknowledged: U.K., China, France, India, Pakistan, Russia, United States, Israel, North Korea1

Seeking: Syria, Iran2

Abandoned: South Africa constructed but then voluntarily dismantled six uranium bombs. Belarus, Kazakhstan, Ukraine; when Soviet Union broke up, these former states possessed nuclear warheads that they have since given up and declared themselves non-nuclear weapon states.

Read more: Countries with Nuclear Weapons Capability http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0762462.html#ixzz3WHUBYnFJ


7 posted on 04/03/2015 1:42:20 PM PDT by Capt. Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

We have an Islamic enemy agent as POTUS and a traitor to the military as Secretary of state. Draw your own conclusions. This world is facing epic danger and WHEN all hell breaks loose, I’ll be damned if I let anyone forget who is directly responsible. That’s if anyone is left.


8 posted on 04/03/2015 1:42:23 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (B. Hussein Obama: 15 acts of Treason and counting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective
I don't think Iran has built a nuclear bomb yet--mostly because of the complexity involved. Even if they did, the number of "gunbarrel" bombs that use uranium-235 is very small, because it's so hard to extract out enough uranium-235 for one bomb.
11 posted on 04/03/2015 1:50:56 PM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

For the last 15 years, the IAEA has been telling us that Iran was either a year or six months away from making a nuclear bomb. I think they’ve got some that were tested in prototype in North Korea.


18 posted on 04/03/2015 2:12:06 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

I think the old rule of thumb applies: If Obama wants it, it is bad for America. If Obama wants it really bad, it is bad for America and the West.


19 posted on 04/03/2015 2:12:26 PM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective
In a negotiation, both sides 'get' something.

The negotiations had nothing to do with Iran getting or not getting nuclear weapons -- on either side. Iran may already have them. Iran may still be 2-5 years away. Nothing agreed to in "the talks" changes, or will change, the reality.

The negotiations were about, and achieved, two things: 1) For Iran, it allows them to escape from sanctions. 2) For The US, it allows Barack 0bama to escape the domestic public humiliation of retreating from a bright line he himself set.

Stupid, uniformed people believe something was accomplished. In fact, only political appearances, and NO strategic realities were changed with respect to Iran.

But don't think Pooty-Poot and the folks in Eastern Europe and the Baltics don't know what happened, and don't think it wasn't noticed by Japan, Taiwan, China, and every other country connected by the Pacific Ocean. The next question is how a thoroughly defeated United States -- interested in nothing but flimsy appearances -- figures into the calculations of our enemies and erstwhile friends.

21 posted on 04/03/2015 2:14:54 PM PDT by FredZarguna (It looks just like a Telefunken U-47 -- with leather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

‘All evidence suggests Iran already has nuclear warheads’


DUH!...


23 posted on 04/03/2015 2:16:13 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

28 posted on 04/03/2015 2:37:41 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Does NYC still exist?

If yes, Iran does not have the bomb...


30 posted on 04/03/2015 2:40:45 PM PDT by null and void (He who kills a tyrant (i.e. an usurper) to free his country is praised and rewarded ~ Thomas Aquinas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

The problem for the mullahs and Persian scientists are the triggers. Exhibit A are the explosions at their milling fabrication sites.

Of course, the Persians will figure it out eventually.

5.56mm


32 posted on 04/03/2015 2:46:16 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective; KarlInOhio; clearcarbon

Mark Urban Diplomatic and defence editor, BBC Newsnight

6 November 2013
From the section Middle East
comments

Saudi Arabia has invested in Pakistani nuclear weapons projects, and believes it could obtain atomic bombs at will, a variety of sources have told BBC Newsnight.

While the kingdom’s quest has often been set in the context of countering Iran’s atomic programme, it is now possible that the Saudis might be able to deploy such devices more quickly than the Islamic republic.

Earlier this year, a senior Nato decision maker told me that he had seen intelligence reporting that nuclear weapons made in Pakistan on behalf of Saudi Arabia are now sitting ready for delivery.

Last month Amos Yadlin, a former head of Israeli military intelligence, told a conference in Sweden that if Iran got the bomb, “the Saudis will not wait one month. They already paid for the bomb, they will go to Pakistan and bring what they need to bring.”


41 posted on 04/03/2015 5:26:57 PM PDT by Capt. Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Go ahead an use them on Mecca.


43 posted on 04/03/2015 9:58:32 PM PDT by Ethan Clive Osgoode (<<== Click here to learn about Evolution!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson