[sickoflibs]

RE:” The Indiana amendment prohibits service providers from using the law as a legal defense for refusing to provide goods, services, facilities or accommodations. It also bars discrimination based on race, color, religion, ancestry, age, national origin, disability, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or U.S. military service.
The measure exempts churches and affiliated schools, along with nonprofit religious organizations. “

Thanks

But Not good,
What was needed was protections for businesses who cant service celebrations of events that they are morally opposed to, like same sex marriage ceremonies.

Those who call it surrender have a point. Its a bounty on Christians.

[piasa]

If burning a flag is free speech, how is refusing to provide a service not free speech?

I know money is payable for “all debts public and private,” but there is no debt until an agreement is made to provide a service or product.

Isn’t forced labor slavery?

[Cincinatus' Wife]

....Gay-rights groups noted that Indiana's civil-rights law still does not include LGBT people as a protected class.....

That is what the activist left purports to want, but didn't get - another protected grievance group - but as you can see in the piece above from Salon - some in the gay community know that this kind of activism hurts them and they don't want it. They know that this isn't about "the issue" that is being pushed by the media and anarchists, it's about the rabid left's self-interested revolution against the country.

[stephenjohnbanker]

” What was needed was protections for businesses who cant service celebrations of events that they are morally opposed to, like same sex marriage ceremonies.

Those who call it surrender have a point. Its a bounty on Christians. “

That is exactly what it is.