Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

If one takes Pakistan to task for bluster, then they should also take India to task for bluster. Heck, I’m taking Putin to task for it right now.

I did mention that India is in a situation where it has to bluster if Pakistan is going to, so I do realize there’s a reason for the bluster.

IMO, Pakistan has been the aggressor with India, so I understand your objection, and wouldn’t disagree with it’s merits.

It’s my thought that you don’t bluster when it comes to the use of nukes. You use back channels to let your opposition know exactly what will happen if they should be so stupid, but it isn’t a matter for public discourse.


19 posted on 04/07/2015 12:53:13 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question is Jeb Bush. The answer is NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne
If one takes Pakistan to task for bluster, then they should also take India to task for bluster. Heck, I’m taking Putin to task for it right now.

India hasn't used its nukes for bluster. It doesn't need to.

28 posted on 04/07/2015 10:38:16 PM PDT by Cronos (ObamaÂ’s dislike of Assad is not based on AssadÂ’s brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne
Neither side has intimated they were on the verge of using nukes over it.

That cover was used by the Pakistanis when they initiated the Kargil war in 1999. But India called the bluff.

29 posted on 04/07/2015 10:38:57 PM PDT by Cronos (ObamaÂ’s dislike of Assad is not based on AssadÂ’s brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson