To: hosepipe
In order for these numbers to make any sense they should be broken down by region, not state.
For example 120k/year in the SF bay area is definitely no better than middle class.
5 posted on
04/02/2015 2:34:58 PM PDT by
skeeter
To: skeeter; martin_fierro
For example 120k/year in the SF bay area is definitely no better than middle class. That's starvation where my parents live (hint: all the real estate listings in their neighborhood feature the letter "M"). 250-300k per year is about middle class in the South Bay.
To: All
7 posted on
04/02/2015 2:39:32 PM PDT by
musicman
(Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
To: skeeter
For example 120k/year in the SF bay area is definitely no better than middle class. Numbers nowadays are crazy and don't make sense. My dad was making about $10,000 a year in 1970, and his home in SF was about $20,000. The home cost about double what he made per year. That same home is worth about a million now. A person making $100,000 can't afford it. That ain't middle class if you can't afford a home.
27 posted on
04/02/2015 7:27:28 PM PDT by
roadcat
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson