Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Run from Cuba, Americans cling to claims for seized property (keep dreaming)
Associated Press ^ | Mar 28, 2015 12:11 PM EDT | Adam Geller

Posted on 03/28/2015 9:33:32 AM PDT by Olog-hai

… Soon after Fidel Castro won control of Cuba in 1959, his government began confiscating the property of thousands of U.S. citizens and companies. For Edmund and Enna Chester, the losses included an 80-acre farm, hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of stock, and a brand new Buick that, who knows, may still be plying Havana’s streets.

The confiscation of American property, valued today at $7 billion or more, was wrapped up in the retaliatory back-and-forth that led to the trade embargo, which remains in place. In 1996, Congress passed a law insisting Cuba repay Americans for what was taken before the embargo can be lifted.

That demand went unmentioned in President Barack Obama’s December announcement that the U.S. and Cuba would resume diplomatic ties. Given Cuba’s frail economy, some experts say companies whose property was taken might gladly settle for rights to do business there today and move on. But a corporation doesn’t hang on to memories the way a family can. That’s clear in places like Chester’s 832-square-foot bungalow in Omaha, pitched atop a corner lot that's mostly slope, where a gold-framed oil portrait of her mother from long ago watches over the yellowing property deed and the worthless stock certificates. They are reminders that the Cuba that existed before Castro is history. But the bitterness over what came after lingers on. …

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Cuba; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: castros; liberalagenda; obama; usproperty

1 posted on 03/28/2015 9:33:32 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
1959???? Man, that's old news! We ain't got time for that stuff!

Now, about those reparations for slavery ...

2 posted on 03/28/2015 9:39:28 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy ("Victim" -- some people eagerly take on the label because of the many advantages that come with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Now that the Cuban communists have a fellow traveler in the White House they needn’t worry about have to pay any restitution to those who had property confiscated.


3 posted on 03/28/2015 9:48:20 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

this is sad... kind of like ambiguous loss... haunting...


4 posted on 03/28/2015 9:53:22 AM PDT by latina4dubya (when i have money i buy books... if i have anything left i buy 6-inch heels and a bottle of wine...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
the solution seems easy to me.

Allow Cuba to once again sell sugar in the US, then apply a special tariff on that to goes into a pool to repay these poor people.

Everyone wins then.

We can once again drink soft drinks made with sugar instead of corn syrup

Cuba can make a lot of money again selling its sugar

and

The victims can get repaid.

5 posted on 03/28/2015 9:54:40 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

And like with China, the communist party gets richer and richer.


6 posted on 03/28/2015 10:00:00 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Maybe Obama can pay it out of his “Stash”.


7 posted on 03/28/2015 10:02:15 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: latina4dubya

Sounds like her concerns will be sold down the river.


8 posted on 03/28/2015 10:04:35 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

HELLO.. if US givernments(fed, state and local) can TAX something YOU OWN...

YOU are merely RENTing IT FROM THEM... and don’t REALLY own it.. THEY DO.. i.e. house, car, other property...

The DELUSION is widespread and deep.. in a KINGDOM of lies..


9 posted on 03/28/2015 10:21:06 AM PDT by hosepipe (" This propaganda has been edited (specifically) to include some fully orbed hyperbole.. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

What West Germany did when it was reunited with the East (where private property had been confiscated)

was to have the government assume all the debts, and leave the confiscated property either in the hands of its new(er) owners, or else sell it.

Cuba may have to do the same thing, to clear all the claims simply and quickly.


10 posted on 03/28/2015 10:33:01 AM PDT by CondorFlight (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

That is a good solution.


11 posted on 03/28/2015 10:58:27 AM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

Sure, anything to keep the communists in power.


12 posted on 03/28/2015 11:09:04 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight

Certainly they will do something like that. Once relations with Cuba are normalized, there will be so much money going back and forth, there will be more than enough to repay Bacardi and anyone else who has a claim.


13 posted on 03/28/2015 11:21:59 AM PDT by PUGACHEV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PUGACHEV

Sure, if you can call “normalization” on the Castro’s terms any kind of normalization.


14 posted on 03/28/2015 11:35:49 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
And like with China, the communist party gets richer and richer.

Sadly ironic. The very people who rail against capitalist are robber barons

15 posted on 03/28/2015 1:12:24 PM PDT by VRW Conspirator (American Jobs for American Workers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: VRW Conspirator
Well, that little blurb in the second chapter of the Communist Manifesto about “despotic inroads” didn’t specify how far they were allowed to go.
The proletariat will use its political supremacy to wrest, by degree, all capital from the bourgeoisie, to centralize all instruments of production in the hands of the State, i.e., of the proletariat organized as the ruling class; and to increase the total productive forces as rapidly as possible.

Of course, in the beginning, this cannot be effected except by means of despotic inroads on the rights of property, and on the conditions of bourgeois production; by means of measures, therefore, which appear economically insufficient and untenable, but which, in the course of the movement, outstrip themselves, necessitate further inroads upon the old social order, and are unavoidable as a means of entirely revolutionizing the mode of production. …
So does this lead to the “vanguard of the revolution” becoming robber barons, or just plain robbers? This is also the same chapter that declares that “in communist society, the present dominates the past”, which requires erasure of history.
16 posted on 03/28/2015 7:17:01 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson