Was this florist, like the bakery in Eugene, Oregon, purposefully singled out by homosexuals BECAUSE of Christian beliefs?
If that is true, and there were other florists who could have taken care of the men’s request, then this florist may have a court case. It seems that homosexuals are purposefully targeting Christians for their religious beliefs, which is a violation of the First Amendment.
I don’t follow your argument.
Are you saying the purposeful targeting is a violation of the First Amendment? How.