Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
Let's get it from Ted Cruz's om mouth.

Here's whathe himself said about immigration:



End Obama's illegal amnesty via Congress' checks & balances

Q: How to respond to the split within your party on immigration? What you're saying is that the Republicans should vote to fund the governments for all departments except one: no funding for the Department of Homeland Security, which handles immigration, rescinding President Obama's executive action, and if he vetoes that, he's responsible for shutting down the department. The problem is that's almost exactly what you did with the government shutdown across the entire government in 2013 with ObamaCare, and it backfired badly on your party.

CRUZ: All across this country, Republicans campaigned, saying: if you elect a Republican Senate, we will stop President Obama's illegal amnesty. We need to honor what we said. We should use the constitutional checks and balances that we have to rein in the abuse of power of the executive. Step #1 is if the president implements this lawless amnesty, that the Senate will not confirm any executive or judicial nominees.

Source: Fox News Sunday 2014 interview of 2016 presidential hopefuls , Nov 23, 2014

Defund amnesty; and refuse any nominees until rescinded

Q: How would you rescind President Obama's executive action on immigration?

CRUZ: We should use the constitutional checks and balances that we have to rein in the abuse of power of the executive. Step #1 that I have called for is the incoming majority leader should announce if the president implements this lawless amnesty, that the Senate will not confirm any executive or judicial nominees, other than vital national security positions, for the next two years, unless and until the president ends this lawless amnesty. That is an explicit authority given to the Senate.

Q: Are you saying the Senate should refuse to confirm the president's new nominee for attorney general?

CRUZ: We have to rein in the executive. In the Federalist Papers, our Framers talked about a president who would behave like a monarch. And step #2, we've got is the power of the purse, and we should fund one at a time the critical priorities of the federal government, but also use the power of the purse to attach riders.

Source: Fox News Sunday 2014 interview of 2016 presidential hopefuls , Nov 23, 2014

No path to citizenship for 1.65 million illegals in Texas

When discussing what to do about the 1.65 million illegal immigrants living in Texas, Cruz weaved into the Second Amendment, alleging his opponent didn't support gun rights. "What does this have to do with the question?" Sadler asked before fiercely denying his opponent's allegation. Cruz again said he didn't support a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants living in America, while Sadler said the opposite, as expected.
Source: WFAA-TV Dallas-Fort Worth on 2012 Texas Senate debate , Oct 2, 2012

Give police more power to ask about immigration status

Cruz accused Dewhurst of using his position as head of the Texas Senate to kill a bill last year that would have given police more power to ask anyone they detain about their citizenship status--a charge Dewhurst denied.

Both agreed that the US has failed to secure its border with Mexico, and said they oppose amnesty for illegal immigrants and the Obama administration's new directive allowing many young illegal immigrants brought to the US as children to be exempted from deportation.

Source: San Francisco Chronicle on 2012 Texas Senate debates , Jun 22, 2012


3 posted on 03/27/2015 7:19:15 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Granted your posted but your wall or words would most be more welcome with a short video . Ever think of that?


7 posted on 03/27/2015 7:29:41 PM PDT by thesligoduffyflynns (sligo surf club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

To paraphrase Whoopie Goldgrabber, is it legal status (green cards) or amnesty? Let’s say you offer up green cards under the stipulation that #1 you haven’t been charged with a felony.

#2 You don’t receive any social welfare benefits (Why did my Danish brother in law that’s been married to my sister for 27 years, that makes 6 figures, who’s had a green card before, have to give a sponsor that is worth 7 figures, before getting another green card?)

#3 Why is there no biometric info on State benefit cards like cross checking to reduce welfare fraud? A Sheriffs Deputy who shall remain unnamed told me that in most arrests, the perp has a wallet full of multiple identities and multiple benefit cards. Anecdotal experience at Wal-Mart on my part can verify this phenomenon. Not to mention the brand new Cadillac Escalade she got into with her litter of feral kids.


11 posted on 03/27/2015 7:43:02 PM PDT by Tailback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

What an incredibly misleading post—trying to make it look like Cruz hasn’t stated his support for legalization (though not citizenship), as long as it isn’t unilaterally done by Obama.

You owe it to your fellow Freepers to at least be honest in your posts.


47 posted on 03/28/2015 12:34:47 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson