Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nachum

“In the deferred prosecution agreement, or DPA, HSBC agreed to pay $1.9 billion in fines and make structural changes as a condition of not pressing criminal charges.”

We need to see what ‘structural changes’ have been made. Like favorable loans to Politicians? Donations to Progressive political groups? Cushy executive jobs for ex-politicians?

Then there is the allocation of the $1.9B fine. Is it already considered appropriated and therefore can be spent on anything the Administration wants?


5 posted on 03/27/2015 11:55:18 AM PDT by Usagi_yo (If you're not leading, you're struggling to be relevant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Usagi_yo

That 1.9 billion dollar fine would’ve been much better used giving some interest on savings accounts. Thus money going back in forth in shady deals between the gov and banks doesn’t help us little folk at all.


8 posted on 03/27/2015 12:47:03 PM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson