Posted on 03/26/2015 3:24:52 AM PDT by SvenMagnussen
California dentist and attorney Orly Taitz has filed a third lawsuit in federal court in Brownsville to stop what she says is the granting of bogus asylum and refugee status to undocumented immigrants and to stop the government from, as she alleges, helping people engaged in identify theft.
The latest civil lawsuit, filed Wednesday, has been assigned to Senior U.S. District Judge Hilda G. Tagle.
Taitz filed the lawsuit against Internal Revenue Service Commissioner John Koskinen, Acting Commission of the Social Security Administration Carolyn Colvin, Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson, President Barack Obama, John Does who steal Social Security numbers and other identifications, and Jane Does who are seeking asylum.
She also claims that Obama is personally using a stolen Social Security number, and other forged identification documents, and that his correct legal name and identity would be established upon discovery.
(Excerpt) Read more at valleymorningstar.com ...
I don’t know about anyone else , but I certainly admire her ‘sticktoittiveness’.
Online law degree and time on her hands.
She's DOing something ... something good, something legal, something FOR America ... something for YOU, ...
That hand feeding you is nourishment ... take ... eat.
Hopefully, Orly will make an Appointments Clause challenge to get to the heart of the matter.
Officers Under the Appointments Clause, by John Plecnik
http://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1783&context=fac_articles
People are amazing.
Well, clogging up the court system can be seen as good, I suppose. Hopefully, the judge will issue some written rulings so we can have a good laugh (also a plus).
ROFL
People are waking up and the judiciary is pretty pissed off with the whole damned administration sticking it to them
A judge ruling in her favor. Now that’s funny.
All evidence of US law is held in trust by the Archivist of the United States. The Archivist is appointed by the President. An ineligible President invalidates appointments made pursuant to the Appointments Clause. Evidence of law held in trust by an Archivist appointed by an ineligible President put the Judiciary Act, as amended, in jeopardy.
The Judiciary Act provided authority for the District Court to operate. This Act established a circuit court and district court in each judicial district. An ineligible President voids the authority of the District Court and ultimately the U.S. Constitution. The courts are avoiding eligibility challenges to preserve the status quo with disregard for their oaths to support the U.S. Constitution.
“And what if a federal judge actually rules in HER favor ?”
An ineligible President voids the US Constitution. All members of Congress and Judicial Branch and all other US federal officers have taken oaths to support the US Constitution. Without the US Constitution, they are immediately unemployed.
you mean the mulatto bastard has actually pulled off the coup ?
don’t knock the online law degree
We learned recently that Jimmy McGill aka Saul Goodman obtained his law degree online and by correspondence from the University of Northern Samoa and passed the New Mexico bar on only his third try. We can feel certain that he is going to rise from such humble beginnings in the mail room to a hugely successful practice
There is no statute of limitations on violations of the US Constitution. Once its violated, its violated forever. An amendment or a US law cannot retroactively fix a violation of the US Constitution.
The system collapses onto itself and new government will need to be formed by a coalition of representatives of the states and the people.
ROFL!!!!
You’re a hoot.
So far the only thing she has done is make a laughing stock of herself, coined the term “birtherism” (heaping scorn on conservatives), and garnered sanctions from the court.
I hope that she is a better dentist.
The question is when and why will he break bad.
Received below email today. Is this what she is referencing?
Is this legit?
Subject: Subject: SSN 042-68-4425”
For those of you who don’t know but at the very bottom of this article the attorney who authored this article is John Wayne’s daughter, Aissa Wayne, also a USC graduate.
Well, Well, Well, it looks like someone thoroughly checked this out! I was wondering who was going to do research into President
Obama’s Social Security number.
Jean Paul Luwig or Barack Hussein Obama? SSN#042-68-4425
WOW, read this, it’s short - very interesting.
An intensive 6-year investigation has revealed the identity of the man whose Social Security Number (SSN) is being used by President Obama.
Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in France in 1890, immigrated to the United States in 1924, and was assigned SSN 042-68-4425 (President Obama’s current SSN) rec’d on or about March 1977.
Mr. Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut . Because of that, his SSN begins with the digits 042, which are among only a select few reserved for Connecticut residents.
Barack H. Obama never lived or worked in that state! Therefore, there is no reason on earth for his SSN to start with the digits 042. None whatsoever!
Now comes the best part! J. P. Ludwig spent the final months of his life in Hawaii, where he died.
Conveniently, Obama ‘s grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham,worked part-time in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse, and therefore had access to the SSNs of deceased individuals.
The Social Security Administration was never informed of Ludwig’s death, and because he never received Social Security benefits there were no benefits to stop and therefore, no questions were ever raised.
The suspicion, of course, is that Dunham, knowing her grandson was not a U.S. Citizen, either because he was born in Kenya, or became a citizen of Indonesia upon his adoption by Lolo Soetoro, simply scoured the probate records, until she found someone, who died who was not receiving Social Security benefits, and selected Mr. Ludwig’s Connecticut SSN for her grandson Barry Obama.
Just wait until the head Birther himself, Donald Trump, gets past the birth certificate and onto the issue of Barry O ‘s use of a stolen SSN. You will see leftist heads exploding, because they will have no way of
defending Obama.
Let ‘s all get this information out to everybody on our mailing lists. If the voters of this great nation can succeed in bringing this lying, deceitful, cheating, corrupt, impostor to justice it will be the biggest and best news in decades for our country and the world
If you can just say “oh well; ho hum” after reading this you get what you deserve .
“In God We Trust.”
Aissa Wayne
LAW OFFICES OF AISSA WAYNE
30765 P.C.H., Suite
203, Malibu , CA 90260
Tel : (310) 457-9999
Fax : (310) 457-0643
I agree. She’s a fighter!
It’s important that Orly not attempt to try the case in the public before trial. A complaint has been filed with accusations alleging the President is not a citizen.
If the President is not a citizen, then Eligibility Clause of the US Constitution is violated. Further, if the President is not a citizen, then appointments made by the ineligible President are a violation of the Appointments Clause. Orly should object to appointees of President Obama and their assignees from answering on behalf of the United States after an alleged violation of the Appointments Clause.
Furthermore, the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure will be implemented as it is in all US District Courts. The FRCP is US law. All US law is held in trust as evidence of US law by the Archivist of the US. The Archivist of the US is appointed by Obama. The ARchivist of the US has a vested interest in the outcome of the trial and must recuse.
Rather than trying to prove Obama is using a SSN number assigned to someone else to prevent a motion to dismiss, Orly should be objecting to violations of Eligibility Clause, Appointments Clause and the Presentment Clause. Those objections must be resolved prior to a ruling on a motion to dismiss brought by federal officers appointed by Obama or assignees of Obama’s appointees.
All federal officers in the Executive Branch, Judicial Branch and Legislative Branch have a vested interest in the outcome of the trial because they are required to support the US Constitution pursuant to Article VI of the US Constitution. Consequently, they must recuse and a Judge that retired before Obama took office must hear the case. Orly should be allowed to personally search for Obama’s federal identity records to prove her case. Allowing individuals who have a vested interest in the outcome of the trial to search is pointless. Allowing judges who will lose their seat if the Obama is found ineligible is pointless. They will certainly dismiss the case to save their job.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.