Posted on 03/25/2015 7:53:00 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Members of the Scientific Council of the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) recently criticized the Royal Society’s positions on climate.
Their clear, authoritative scientific objections to the Royal Society’s positions reveal the weak scientific foundation on which the great climate fervor has been based. The public must either become conversant enough to grasp this or step back and get out of the way of those who have. Scientists don’t need to be paid to oppose the ideas of climate orthodoxy, because those ideas are just so damn bad.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Too much govt money supporting bad science.
The science of global warming is that you must believe it not because of the evidence, but because everyone who matters says don’t question it. Of course if that was “science”, we’d still think the sun goes around the earth.
non of this matters to those in power who WILL implement climate change regulations- ALL the science could say it is a hoax, and those in power will NEVER admit they LIED to us, and they WILL continue with their plan to financially ruin us- by executive order if necessary
There is no global warming and what the frick is climate change? I want objective criteria that I can measure every day and they have nothing but a desire to take your culture and life style.To oblivion with them.
I never get tired of saying it — my daughter is a mere college student. And the three snowiest winters in the history of Boston have all occurred during her lifetime.
This is not a warming trend.
“Climate change is of course real; change being the normal state of affairs in climate,” Lindzen told Climate Depot. “Climate change has caused catastrophic problems on occasion throughout the earth’s history. While man may have contributed somewhat to climate change in recent years, his contribution to the above is highly questionable, and continues to be debated.”
“In the case of Bernie Sanders, a socialist, he is undoubtedly dreaming about nationalizing the energy industry,” Lindzen said. “For the U.S. Senate to accept guidance from Sanders’ bizarre dreams is ludicrous.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.