Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman

And apparently we’re happy about this? The 2nd Amendment does NOT say, “Shall not be infringed, as long as you have a background check”. It’s pretty clear that background checks are un-Constitutional, and that FFL dealers are the lowest scumbag money grubbing rotten ba$tards for making money off the destruction of our God given rights. Piss on em all. I refuse to submit to a background check, period.


4 posted on 03/24/2015 9:46:34 AM PDT by dware (The GOP is dead. Long live Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dware

None of it makes me/us happy. Agreed that it is all “infringement”, but the bloomer led initiative will make criminals out of a lot of people. By design? Probably. Sadly WA state passed a similar initiative last election and they are still trying to figure out the workings of how to enforce and who’s violated it and who hasn’t. No doubt that since the forces of evil managed to “persuade” (lies and obsfucation) more than twice the number required to sign the petition in NV, the IPOS/SPOS/LPOS will be easily convinced this initiative on the ballot will save everybody from EVER being harmed by a firearm.


6 posted on 03/24/2015 10:02:09 AM PDT by rktman (Served in the Navy to protect the rights of those that want to take some of mine away. Odd, eh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson