The quickest way to get rid of a bad law is to fully implement all its provisions.
When the lawyers end up with two diametrically opposed interpretations of what the law was supposed to mean, that sets up the crisis. When the opposing views are enforced to the full extent called for under the law, it becomes unenforceable, and even if not repealed, it becomes dead letter. Not an ideal situation, but some measure of satisfying.
For part of the electorate.
[ The quickest way to get rid of a bad law is to fully implement all its provisions. ]
Sadly, Selective enforcement has become the norm and we live in a tyranny built upon the cornerstone of selective enforcement.