Both Fox and NBC played clips of Bibi saying he was for a Palestinian State and a 2 state solution. Then they played Obama saying Bibi was against a 2 state solution, which seemed to be a blatant lie following the clips of Bibi.
It seems Obama’s definition of a 2 state solution is a solution in which the PLO-Hamas continue terrorist attacks on school children. Bibi’s definition is a Palestinian state that recognizes Jewish Israel’s right to exist and no Palestinian military. Bibi’s definition does not fit Obama’s definition and therefore Bibi is not for a 2 state solution.
Chris Wallace, Chuck Todd and the news media in general repeatedly LIE that Bibi said he is against a 2 state solution. They don’t mention the context of “without” the 2 conditions.
The thing that “puts the lie to Obama” and what the liberal media is saying ... is that Netanyahu has had the SAME POSITION since his Bar-Ilan speech of 2009. So “Netanyahu” has not changed.
It’s the LYIMG OBAMA who has changed “his position” in relation to “Bar-Ilan”!!
Bibi, Bibi, Bibi. He’s much less powerful than a US President, and recognizing a Palestinian state would require a unity government,or, more likely, an election meant as a referendum.
It’s not a secret he would in theory give up Judea, Samaria, Gaza and east Jerusalem for the ***right*** kind of deal. Almost every secular and a lot of religious Israelis would.
A lot of this blather is just American politics.
The problem is not Netanyahu or Israel.